Avodah Zarah 38b
עבודה זרה ל״ח ע״ב
Learn Avodah Zarah 38b step by step: Aramaic beside English, every question, answer and proof colour-coded.
Open Avodah Zarah 38b in Gemara Clarity
Topic
בישולי גוים and other foods of גויים: which are permitted and which are forbidden
Overview
This amud is about food that גויים cooked or prepared (בישולי גוים), and when it is still permitted. First the גמרא rules that food is forbidden only if a גוי did all of the cooking. If a Jew placed the food on the fire or turned it over, it is permitted, and רבינא applies this to bread, even when the Jew only stoked the coals. Next come disputes about salted fish and roasted eggs, and a story at the house of ריש גלותא where רב זביד rules like רבי יוחנן that a roasted egg is forbidden. A ברייתא lists simple foods of גויים that are permitted, and the גמרא explains what the bean called שיעתא is and how it was grown. Then come rules about date husks cooked in large or small pots, which depend on נותן טעם לפגם. רב ספרא challenges רב ששת's ban on cooked oil, and רבי אסי says boiled medium dates are forbidden. רב and לוי argue about the dish שתיתא, and in practice people were lenient. Finally, חזקיה and רבי יוחנן argue about benefiting from pickles of גויים that are known to contain wine. The answer to the last question comes on the next amud.
Opening lines
וּמְגִיסָה, עַד שֶׁתָּבֹא
and she stirs it, until she comes back
מִבֵּית הַמֶּרְחָץ אוֹ מִבֵּית הַכְּנֶסֶת,
from the bathhouse or from the synagogue,
וְאֵינָהּ חוֹשֶׁשֶׁת.
and she need not be concerned.
אִיבַּעְיָא לְהוּ:
A question was raised before them:
The steps (38)
- StatementA gentile woman may stir the Jewish woman's pot
- QuestionWhat if the gentile placed it and the Jew turned it over?
- ResponseA קל וחומר: if the Jew finished the cooking, surely it is permitted
- Proofרבי יוחנן agrees: forbidden only if the gentile did it all
- ConclusionThe הלכה for bread: any part by a Jew makes it permitted
- StatementSalted fish and roasted eggs: who permits and who forbids
- Statementרב דימי's version: both Sages permit both foods
- QuestionThe question at the house of ריש גלותא
- ResponseTwo Sages outweigh one, so the egg is allowed
- Rejectionרב זביד: the law follows רבי יוחנן
- StatementA ברייתא lists which foods of גויים are allowed
- Statementמטליא has other names
- QuestionWhat is שיעתא?
- ResponseIt came from מצרים: forty years ago or sixty?
- ResolutionNo real dispute: each spoke in his own time
- ResponseHow the plants for שיעתא were grown
- Statementרבי חנינא's reaction to the story
- StatementDate husks of גויים: large pot versus small pot
- QuestionWhat counts as a small pot?
- Responseרבי ינאי: too small for a swallow to enter
- ChallengeBut maybe they cut the food into pieces
- ResolutionCorrected measure: too small for a swallow's head
- ChallengeAnother ברייתא permits both pots
- ResolutionThe two ברייתות follow different views on נותן טעם לפגם
- StatementCooked oil of non-Jews is forbidden
- Challengeרב ספרא rejects every possible reason to forbid the oil
- QuestionThe question about boiled dates, narrowed down
- Responseרבי אסי answers: my teacher Levi forbade them
- StatementArgument about שתיתא made by non-Jews
- StatementFirst version: they argue about lentils made with water
- StatementSecond version: they argue about wheat and barley
- Statementברזילי sent two kinds of שתיתא to דוד
- ConclusionIn נהרדעא everyone sells שתיתא freely
- Statementחזקיה: if wine is known to be inside, even benefit is forbidden
- ChallengeWhy is this different from fish brine?
- ResolutionWine for smell versus wine for taste
- Statementרבי יוחנן: even when known, benefit is permitted
- ChallengeWhy is this different from רבי מאיר's fish brine ruling?