Gemara Clarity

Bava Kamma 113a

בבא קמא קי״ג ע״א

Learn Bava Kamma 113a step by step: Aramaic beside English, every question, answer and proof colour-coded.

Open Bava Kamma 113a in Gemara Clarity

Topic

Court summonses and נידוי, heirs returning stolen items, and money from customs collectors under דינא דמלכותא דינא

Overview

The amud opens by limiting when a court may place someone in נידוי for ignoring a summons sent through a woman or a neighbor. If he was in town, passed by the courthouse, or did not come home that same day, the messenger may never have told him. רבא then teaches when a פתיחא is torn up, and רב חסדא rules that a court gives three dates, Monday, Thursday and Monday, before writing one. רב כהנא explains that a woman who is always in town and still does not come may get a פתיחא right away. רב יהודה and רב נחמן list times when no court date is set: ניסן, תשרי, ערב שבת and ערב יום טוב, and during Torah gatherings. Nowadays, because of tricksters, the court does summon people even during those gatherings. The גמרא then returns to the משנה: heirs must return even a well-known stolen animal, or a bed or table, for their father's honor. A new משנה forbids taking change or charity from the funds of customs and tax collectors. Each time the גמרא challenges a source with שמואל's rule דינא דמלכותא דינא, it answers that the collector had no fixed rate or appointed himself, and רב אשי adds that the collector was a non-Jew. That leads to a challenge, which continues on the next amud: רבי עקיבא himself teaches from a פסוק that גזל גוי is forbidden.

Opening lines

אֲבָל אִיתֵיהּ בְּמָתָא – לָא;

But if he is in the city – no;

דְּאָמְרִינַן: אֵימַר לָא אֲמַרוּ לֵיהּ,

for we say: perhaps they did not tell him,

דְּאָמְרִי: (אַשְׁכְּחִינְהוּ) [אַשְׁכְּחֵיהּ]

because they say: found him

שְׁלִיחָא דְּבֵית דִּין, וַאֲמַר לֵיהּ.

the court's messenger, and told him.

The steps (37)

  1. StatementNo ostracism if the defendant is in the city
  2. StatementNo ostracism if he passes by the courthouse
  3. StatementNo ostracism if he does not come home that same day
  4. Statementרבא: when a document of ostracism is torn up
  5. RejectionA promise to obey is enough
  6. StatementThree court dates before a פתיחא
  7. Challengeרב אסי sees a פתיחא written after one missed date
  8. ResolutionThree dates are for a man; a woman in town is a rebel
  9. StatementNo court dates during ניסן, תשרי, or the day before יום טוב and שבת
  10. StatementSetting a date for later: allowed in ניסן and תשרי, not on ערב שבת
  11. ResponseWhy ערב שבת is different: people are busy and may forget
  12. StatementNo court dates for people gathered to learn Torah
  13. Statementרב נחמן sends away people who bring lawsuits during the kalla
  14. ConclusionNowadays tricksters change the practice
  15. StatementHeirs must return even a well-known stolen cow or donkey
  16. QuestionWhat about a stolen bed or table?
  17. Responseרב: a wise man can work it out
  18. Statementמשנה: Do not take money from tax collectors' funds
  19. StatementYou may pay with a coin and take back change
  20. ChallengeIsn't the law of the kingdom binding?
  21. ResolutionA collector with no set limit
  22. ResolutionA collector who appointed himself
  23. StatementSome attach this to the משנה about wearing כלאים
  24. StatementThis משנה does not follow רבי עקיבא
  25. ProofThe ברייתא: may one avoid customs?
  26. StatementExplaining the כלאים dispute as a debate about unintended acts
  27. ChallengeHow can evading customs be allowed if the king's law is binding?
  28. ResolutionAnswer: the collector has no fixed rate
  29. ResolutionAnother answer: the collector was never appointed
  30. StatementAnother version: the משנה about vowing before customs collectors
  31. ChallengeHow can one deceive customs collectors if the king's law is binding?
  32. ResolutionAnswer: the collector has no fixed rate
  33. ResolutionAnother answer: the collector was never appointed
  34. Resolutionרב אשי: The משנה Is About a Non-Jewish Collector
  35. ProofThe ברייתא About a Court Case Between a Jew and a Non-Jew
  36. ProofEven רבי עקיבא Agrees When No קידוש השם Is Involved
  37. ChallengeChallenge: Is Robbing a Non-Jew Really Allowed?