Bava Kamma 54b
בבא קמא נ״ד ע״ב
Learn Bava Kamma 54b step by step: Aramaic beside English, every question, answer and proof colour-coded.
Open Bava Kamma 54b in Gemara Clarity
Topic
Which oxen make a pit owner liable, and how the תורה's 'ox and donkey' laws extend to all animals
Overview
The amud opens by asking whether the משנה implies that a smart, normal ox falling into a pit leaves the owner exempt. רבי ירמיה says no: the משנה only lists the weak oxen because they are the surprising case. רב אחא challenges this with ברייתות about a 'בר דעת' falling in, and in the end רבא sets רבי ירמיה's reading aside. He rules that only a deaf, foolish, young, blind or night-walking ox makes the owner liable, because a normal ox should watch where it goes. A new משנה then teaches that many laws written about an 'ox' or 'donkey' apply to every animal, wild animal and bird. The גמרא finds a source for each law, and many of them are linked to שבת through a גזירה שוה. It proves from the extra words 'וכל בהמתך' in the second עשרת הדברות that שבת covers all creatures, working through כלל ופרט and ריבוי along the way. It also explains why people, who appear in the same שבת verse, may still plow alongside an animal. The amud ends as רבי חנינא בן עגיל begins asking why the word 'good' appears only in the second version of the עשרת הדברות, and his question continues on the next amud.
Opening lines
הָא שׁוֹר שֶׁהוּא פִּקֵּחַ – פָּטוּר?
But then, an ox that is smart, would he be exempt?
אָמַר רַבִּי יִרְמְיָה:
Rabbi Yirmeya said:
לָא מִיבַּעְיָא קָאָמַר;
It is speaking in a 'there is no need to say' style;
לָא מִבַּעְיָא שׁוֹר שֶׁהוּא פִּקֵּחַ – דְּחַיָּיב;
there is no need to say that for a smart ox he is liable;
The steps (37)
- ChallengeWould a smart ox be exempt?
- ResolutionRabbi Yirmeya: 'It goes without saying'
- Challengeרב אחא quotes a ברייתא exempting a 'בר דעת'
- Resolutionרבינא: it means a person
- ChallengeThen would a person who is not competent make the owner liable?
- ResolutionIt means a species that is בן דעת
- ChallengeA ברייתא that says 'an ox that is בן דעת'
- Resolutionרבא: Only a weak-minded ox makes the pit owner liable
- ProofA ברייתא supports רבא
- StatementNew משנה: Many 'ox' laws apply to every animal
- StatementWild animals and birds too; the תורה spoke of the usual case
- ProofSource for any animal in a pit
- ProofSource for all creatures keeping away from הר סיני
- ProofDouble payment applies to any animal
- ProofReturning a lost item applies to any animal
- ProofUnloading is learned from שבת through the word 'donkey'
- ProofMuzzling is learned from שבת through the word 'ox'
- ProofBoth kinds of mixing are learned from שבת
- QuestionHow do we know this about שבת itself?
- ResponseThe two versions of the עשרת הדברות
- ChallengeMaybe it is a general term followed by a detail
- ResolutionA second general term widens it to all living creatures
- ChallengeMaybe the shared trait is a carcass that makes things טמא
- ResolutionTwo details show the trait is wider
- RejectionEach detail is needed for its own reason
- Resolution'And all your animals' is an including word
- ChallengeIs every 'כל' really a ריבוי?
- ProofThe ברייתא on spending מעשר money
- ProofThe ברייתא finishes: only things like the detail are included
- Resolution'בכל' is a general statement, but 'כל' is an inclusion
- ResolutionEven if 'כל' is usually a general statement, here the extra word makes it an inclusion
- ChallengeIf 'כל' includes everything, why name specific animals?
- Resolution'Ox' is needed to link שבת with the law of muzzling
- ResolutionDonkey teaches unloading, your animal teaches mixed species
- ChallengeThen a person should be forbidden to plow with an animal
- ResolutionPeople are compared to animals only for resting
- QuestionWhy is 'good' missing from the first version of the עשרת הדברות?