Bechoros 46b
בכורות מ״ו ע״ב
Bekhorot 46b
Learn Bechoros 46b step by step: Aramaic beside English, every question, answer and proof colour-coded.
Open Bechoros 46b in Gemara Clarity
Topic
What counts as birth when only the head or forehead emerges: שמואל's rule for a נפל is refuted, and ריש לקיש and רבי יוחנן disagree about the forehead and the firstborn's inheritance.
Overview
The גמרא opens with שמואל: a נפל's head coming out does not count as its birth, because only a creature with 'breath of life in its nostrils' has a head that matters. The גמרא challenges him from our משנה, which uses the word 'ראשו' for a נפל. It first answers that the word means 'רובו' and was written only to match the next clause about a nine-month baby. That defense collapses, because the rule for a nine-month baby's head is already taught in חולין for animals and in נדה for humans. So the גמרא declares שמואל conclusively refuted. Next, ריש לקיש rules that a forehead coming out counts as birth everywhere except for the firstborn's inheritance, because the Torah says 'יכיר'. רבי יוחנן says it counts even for inheritance. The גמרא challenges רבי יוחנן with sources that require seeing the nose to recognize a face. It answers by reading 'up to the nose,' and by explaining that testimony letting a woman remarry has a special rabbinic strictness about identifying the body. The עמוד ends as the גמרא begins a second answer, which continues on the next עמוד.
Opening lines
גְּמָ׳ אָמַר שְׁמוּאֵל:
Gemara: Shmuel said:
אֵין הָרֹאשׁ פּוֹטֵר בִּנְפָלִים.
The head does not exempt in the case of non-viable fetuses.
מַאי טַעְמָא?
What is the reason?
״כֹּל אֲשֶׁר נִשְׁמַת רוּחַ חַיִּים בְּאַפָּיו״ —
'All in whose nostrils was the breath of the spirit of life' —
The steps (24)
- Statementשמואל: The head of a non-viable fetus does not exempt
- QuestionAsking for שמואל's source
- ResponseOnly a living creature's head counts
- ChallengeChallenge from the משנה's word 'its head'
- Resolution'Its head' really means 'most of it'
- ChallengeThen why not say 'most of it'?
- ResolutionThe first clause copies the wording of the second clause
- ChallengeThe nine-month clause seems to teach nothing new
- ResolutionMaybe one source is for animals and one is for humans
- RejectionThe rule for humans is also already taught
- Conclusionשמואל is conclusively refuted
- StatementA forehead counts as birth except for inheritance
- StatementA forehead counts even for inheritance
- QuestionWhat does 'in all cases' include?
- ResponseThe convert whose baby's forehead came out before she converted
- ChallengeA ברייתא says recognition needs the face with the nose
- ResolutionRead it as 'up to the nose'
- ChallengeTestimony about a dead man requires the nose
- ResolutionAgain, read it as 'up to the nose'
- ChallengeA source that clearly requires the nose, with a פסוק
- ResolutionTestimony for a woman is stricter
- ChallengeWere the Rabbis really strict? They were lenient in this testimony
- ResolutionLenient about reporting the death, but not about identifying the body
- ResolutionOpening a second possible answer