Chullin 86b
חולין פ״ו ע״ב
Learn Chullin 86b step by step: Aramaic beside English, every question, answer and proof colour-coded.
Open Chullin 86b in Gemara Clarity
Topic
Why רבי מאיר needs a רוב, which of רבי's rulings is final, and the rules of covering the blood of many animals (כיסוי הדם)
Overview
The amud begins by finishing a challenge to רבי אמי. If רבי מאיר joins a מיעוט to a חזקה in the dough case, why does slaughter by a חרש, שוטה וקטן need a רוב? The answer is that being lenient about a ספק טומאה does not allow being lenient about a ספק איסור. Next, the גמרא asks which of רבי's two rulings, one like רבי מאיר and one like the חכמים, came later. A story about רבי אמי, רבי זירא and רבי אבא shows the question was asked in the בית מדרש but not answered. רבי אלעזר's message to בבל, which mentions only the ruling like רבי מאיר, proves that ruling was the later one. A new משנה teaches that one covering of blood is enough for many חיות and birds slaughtered in one place, while רבי יהודה says to cover the חיה's blood before slaughtering the bird. The גמרא explains how each side reads the words "או" and "דמו" in the פסוק. Finally, רבי חנינא says רבי יהודה agrees that only one ברכה is said, and the גמרא challenges this from a story about רב's students and the cup of wine.
Opening lines
סְמוֹךְ מִיעוּטָא לַחֲזָקָה
Join the minority to the presumption
וְאִיתְּרַע לֵיהּ רוּבָּא.
and the majority is weakened.
אִם אָמְרוּ סְפֵק טוּמְאָה לְטַהֵר,
If they said that in a case of doubtful impurity we rule it pure,
יֹאמְרוּ סְפֵק אִיסּוּר לְהַתִּיר?
will they say that in a case of doubtful prohibition we rule it permitted?
The steps (24)
- ChallengeJoin the minority to the presumption and the majority is weakened
- ResolutionImpurity doubts are not like prohibition doubts
- Statementרבי ruled both ways
- QuestionWhich ruling came last?
- ProofA story outside the בית מדרש begins
- ProofInside the study hall, the same question comes up
- QuestionSo what was decided?
- Proofרבי אלעזר's message to בבל
- ChallengeBut רבי also ruled like the חכמים
- ConclusionThe ruling like רבי מאיר was the later one
- StatementThe משנה: one covering is enough for many
- Statementרבי יהודה: cover the חיה first, then slaughter the bird
- ProofThe פסוק's words include many or few
- ConclusionFrom here comes the משנה's rule
- Statementרבי יהודה: cover the animal's blood first, then slaughter the bird
- ChallengeThe רבנן answer with another פסוק
- QuestionWhat is the Rabbis' point?
- ResponseThe word "or" is needed for a different lesson
- Resolutionרבי יהודה learns the separation from "its blood"
- RejectionThe רבנן: "its blood" can mean a lot of blood
- Statementרבי יהודה agrees only one blessing is said
- ChallengeHow is this different from רב's students?
- ProofThe story of רב's students and the cup of wine
- ChallengeCovering the blood should require a new blessing