Eruvin 16b
עירובין ט״ז ע״ב
Learn Eruvin 16b step by step: Aramaic beside English, every question, answer and proof colour-coded.
Open Eruvin 16b in Gemara Clarity
Topic
Breached fences and פרוץ כעומד, the משנה of rope and reed partitions, and how much space an individual or a caravan may enclose
Overview
The amud opens by finishing the question of who wrote a ברייתא about breached fences. אביי says all of it follows the רבנן, and רבא says all of it follows רבן שמעון בן גמליאל. The גמרא then brings a ברייתא that seems to refute רב פפא's view that a breach equal to the standing part (פרוץ כעומד) is permitted. Even so, the הלכה follows רב פפא, because a precise reading of the משנה supports him. A new משנה follows. It teaches that a camp may be fenced with stacked ropes or upright reeds, as long as the gaps are under three טפחים. It also brings disputes over whether this works only for a שיירא and whether a fence needs both שתי וערב. In the גמרא, רב המנונא asks whether 'more standing than open' works for a sideways fence. אביי's attempted proof is rejected, and the question is reframed. Finally, the גמרא sorts out how much space an individual and a caravan may enclose. רב נחמן publicly retracts a ruling and concludes that three people, as a שיירא, get all the space they need.
Opening lines
אֲתָאן לְרַבָּן שִׁמְעוֹן בֶּן גַּמְלִיאֵל
We have arrived at Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel
דְּאָמַר: פָּחוֹת מֵאַרְבָּעָה לָבוּד.
who said: less than four is lavud (considered joined).
דְּאִי רַבָּנַן:
For if it were the Rabbis,
מִשְּׁלֹשָׁה וְעַד אַרְבָּעָה?
why list 'from three until four' separately?
The steps (38)
- ChallengeThe latter clause seems to follow רבן שמעון בן גמליאל
- Resolutionאביי: the whole ברייתא follows the רבנן
- Resolutionרבא: the whole ברייתא follows רבן שמעון בן גמליאל
- ProofA new ברייתא about walls made mostly of doors and windows
- ChallengeThe ברייתא's word 'most' cannot be right
- ResolutionCorrecting the ברייתא's wording
- ChallengeThe corrected ברייתא seems to refute רב פפא
- Conclusionרב פפא is refuted, yet the הלכה follows him
- ChallengeHow can he be both refuted and the הלכה?
- ResolutionThe משנה's precise wording supports רב פפא
- StatementNew משנה: a partition made of three ropes
- StatementThe ropes must be thick enough to reach ten handbreadths
- StatementA fence of upright reeds
- StatementOnly for a caravan, or for everyone?
- StatementMust a fence have both upright and sideways parts?
- StatementFor upright reeds, more standing than open counts as a wall
- QuestionWhat about a fence of sideways ropes?
- Proofאביי's proof from the rope thickness rule
- ProofThe cheaper fence that would work if the rule applied
- RejectionWhere would the four-handbreadth gap go?
- RejectionPlacing the big gap at the top also fails
- RejectionPlacing the big gap in the middle raises a different, unresolved question
- ResolutionReframing רב המנונא's question as a mat with a hole
- Resolutionרב אשי: the question was about a hanging partition
- Questionרבי טבלא asks רב about a hanging partition
- Responseרב answers: a hanging partition works only over water
- StatementQuoting the משנה and drawing an inference
- ChallengeA ברייתא shows רבי יהודה allows it for one person
- ResolutionThe caravan rule only means unlimited space
- QuestionWhere was רב נחמן's line first said?
- ResponseIt was said on רבי יוסי son of רבי יהודה's rule
- ChallengeA ברייתא has him allowing rope partitions
- ChallengeThe חכמים' view completes the challenging ברייתא
- Resolutionשתי וערב is needed only for unlimited space
- StatementHow much space individuals and caravans receive
- ChallengeWhy follow the minority over the רבנן?
- Resolutionרב נחמן publicly admits his mistake
- ConclusionThe corrected rule: a caravan of three gets all its needs