Gemara Clarity

Eruvin 45b

עירובין מ״ה ע״ב

Learn Eruvin 45b step by step: Aramaic beside English, every question, answer and proof colour-coded.

Open Eruvin 45b in Gemara Clarity

Topic

Overlapping ארבע אמות zones, and whether חפצי הפקר acquire שביתה according to רבי יוחנן בן נורי (the rain and cistern proofs)

Overview

This amud finishes the משנה about people limited to ארבע אמות whose zones overlap. The משנה then gives a rule for three people in a row, and רבי שמעון compares that case to three courtyards joined by עירובין. The גמרא opens with רבא asking why רבי יוחנן בן נורי gives a sleeping traveler 2000 אמות. Is it because חפצי הפקר acquire שביתה, or only because a sleeper is treated like someone awake? רב יוסף proves the first option from a ברייתא about rain that fell before יום טוב. רב ספרא challenges that proof. אביי answers with a contradiction between a משנה and a ברייתא about public cisterns, and רב יוסף gives a simpler answer from the wording of the rain ברייתא itself. The גמרא then asks why rain that falls on יום טוב did not acquire שביתה in the ocean or in the clouds. It answers with clouds formed before יום טוב, and with the rule that water absorbed in a cloud cannot acquire שביתה. Because of that second answer, the attempt to prove that there are no תחומין above ten טפחים fails.

Opening lines

וּבִלְבַד שֶׁלֹּא יוֹצִיא זֶה

provided that this one does not carry out

מִתּוֹךְ שֶׁלּוֹ לְתוֹךְ שֶׁל חֲבֵרוֹ.

from within his own area into that of his fellow.

הָיוּ שְׁלֹשָׁה

if there were three

וְהָאֶמְצָעִי מוּבְלָע בֵּינֵיהֶן —

and the middle one is overlapped between them —

The steps (26)

  1. StatementThe condition for two people sharing their overlapping area
  2. StatementThree people in a row with the middle one overlapping both
  3. Statementרבי שמעון compares the case to three courtyards
  4. Questionרבא asks what רבי יוחנן בן נורי's reasoning is
  5. QuestionFirst side: he should argue about utensils too, but a person shows the רבנן's strength
  6. QuestionSecond side: ownerless things don't acquire, but a sleeper is like an awake person
  7. Proofרב יוסף brings the case of rain that fell before יום טוב
  8. ProofThe rain ברייתא fits if ownerless objects acquire residence
  9. ProofWithout the ownerless view, the rain ברייתא fits no one
  10. RejectionMaybe the rain counts because the townspeople had it in mind
  11. ResolutionA city's cistern follows the city, not 2000 אמות from the cistern
  12. ChallengeThe משנה and a ברייתא about public cisterns contradict
  13. ResolutionThe two cistern sources follow two different opinions
  14. Statementאביי reports his exchange with רב ספרא to רב יוסף
  15. Rejectionרב יוסף: refute רב ספרא from the ברייתא itself
  16. ConclusionTown-owned rain would follow the townspeople's limits
  17. StatementQuoting the rain ברייתא: rain that falls on יום טוב
  18. ChallengeShouldn't the rain have acquired שביתה in the ocean?
  19. ChallengeThe question only works according to רבי אליעזר
  20. Resolutionרבי יצחק: the clouds formed before יום טוב
  21. ChallengeMaybe these are different clouds
  22. ResolutionThe clouds have an identifying sign
  23. ResolutionSecond answer: a doubt in a rabbinic law is treated leniently
  24. ChallengeWhy doesn't the water get a home in the clouds?
  25. ProofProof that there are no תחומין above ten טפחים
  26. RejectionRejection: water inside clouds is absorbed