Kiddushin 24b
קידושין כ״ד ע״ב
Learn Kiddushin 24b step by step: Aramaic beside English, every question, answer and proof colour-coded.
Open Kiddushin 24b in Gemara Clarity
Topic
Which injuries free an עבד כנעני, whether he needs a גט שחרור, and the details of indirect, partial and accidental injuries
Overview
This amud keeps working out which injuries free an עבד כנעני. The גמרא explains why the תורה names both a tooth and an eye. It then reads the פסוק as a כלל ופרט וכלל with a ריבוי, so any visible injury that does not heal frees the slave, even if the limb still works. A ברייתא then brings a מחלוקת about whether the freed slave also needs a גט שחרור. רבי שמעון learns from a divorced wife that a document is needed, and רבי מאיר reads ״לחפשי ישלחנו״ to mean he is free at once. Next come cases: a blow near the eye or ear, which leads רב אשי to explain that a person hurt by noise really frightened himself. Then the גמרא discusses a weakened eye or loosened tooth, and a doctor master who blinds his slave while treating him, where רבן שמעון בן גמליאל requires intent to destroy. רב ששת rules that removing an already-blind eye frees the slave, with support from the law of bird קרבנות. A new ruling from רב begins at the end and continues on the next amud.
Opening lines
שֵׁן דְּחָלָב,
even a baby tooth [would free him],
כְּתַב רַחֲמָנָא ״עַיִן״.
so the Merciful One wrote 'eye.'
וְאִי כְּתַב רַחֲמָנָא ״עַיִן״
And if the Merciful One had written only 'eye,'
הֲוָה אָמֵינָא מָה עַיִן שֶׁנִּבְרָא עִמּוֹ
I would have said: just as an eye was created with him,
The steps (33)
- ResolutionWhy the תורה needed both tooth and eye
- ChallengeChallenge: maybe only a tooth and an eye count
- ResolutionAnswer: the פסוק generalizes again at the end
- ChallengeWhy not require that the limb stop working too?
- ResolutionAnswer: ״לחפשי ישלחנו״ widens the law
- ChallengeIf it is a widening phrase, why doesn't a temporary injury free the slave?
- ResolutionTooth and eye must still limit the law
- StatementDoes the freed slave need a release document?
- StatementThe deciders split the ruling
- ChallengeIt's not a penalty, it comes from the פסוקים
- ResolutionIt means a Sages' derivation
- QuestionWhat is רבי שמעון's source?
- ResponseLearning the slave from a divorced wife
- Responseרבי מאיר: the word order shows he is already free
- StatementStriking the eye or ear itself versus striking near it
- ChallengeIsn't damage caused by sound real damage?
- ResolutionA person is different: he frightens himself
- ProofSupport from the law of one who frightens another
- StatementA weakened eye or a loosened tooth
- StatementAn eye already weak or a tooth already loose before the blow
- StatementWhy both teachings about a weak eye are needed
- StatementThe doctor master who blinds his slave while treating him
- Statementרבן שמעון בן גמליאל: the master must intend to destroy
- QuestionWhat do the Sages learn from 'and destroys it'?
- ResponseThe Sages use it for the unborn baby case
- QuestionHow does רבן שמעון בן גמליאל learn רבי אלעזר's case?
- ResponseHe learns it from the extra ending of the word
- QuestionWhy don't the רבנן use that same extra ending?
- ResponseThe רבנן do not read meaning into that difference
- StatementRemoving an eye that was already blind frees the עבד
- ProofA ברייתא: birds are not disqualified by blemishes
- ProofA bird missing a limb, such as a removed eye, is disqualified
- Statementרב begins a new ruling about the slave