Moed Katan 26a
מועד קטן כ״ו ע״א
Learn Moed Katan 26a step by step: Aramaic beside English, every question, answer and proof colour-coded.
Open Moed Katan 26a in Gemara Clarity
Topic
קרעין שאין מתאחין: which mourning tears are never mended, the sources for each, and how to tear and stitch them
Overview
This amud opens with a ברייתא that lists the tears of mourning that may never be properly sewn back together. They are for a parent, one's רבו who taught him תורה, the נשיא, the אב בית דין, bad news, ברכת השם, a burned ספר תורה, and the ruined ערי יהודה, מקדש and ירושלים. The גמרא then finds a פסוק for each case. אלישע's cry as אליהו went up to heaven teaches the rule for parents and for a רבו, and the extra words 'into two pieces' show the tear stays forever. דוד's mourning for שאול and יהונתן teaches the rule for the נשיא, the אב בית דין and bad news. Bad news here means only a disaster that strikes most of the nation. חזקיהו's officials teach the rule for ברכת השם, and יהויקים burning ירמיהו's scroll teaches the rule for a burned ספר תורה. רב הונא adds that a torn ספר תורה needs two tears, and שמואל limits this to destruction by force. Finally, the גמרא gives the פסוקים to say over the ruined cities, ירושלים and the מקדש, and settles when one tear is enough. It ends with a ברייתא allowing rough stitching but not real mending, and begins a statement of רב חסדא that continues on the next amud.
Opening lines
וְאֵלּוּ קְרָעִין שֶׁאֵין מִתְאַחִין:
And these are the tears that are never mended:
הַקּוֹרֵעַ עַל אָבִיו וְעַל אִמּוֹ,
One who tears for his father or for his mother,
וְעַל רַבּוֹ שֶׁלִּימְּדוֹ תּוֹרָה,
or for his teacher who taught him Torah,
וְעַל נָשִׂיא וְעַל אָב בֵּית דִּין,
or for the Nasi, or for the head of the court,
The steps (46)
- StatementThe list of tears that are never mended
- QuestionWhere do we learn tearing for parents and a teacher?
- Responseאלישע's cry teaches both cases
- QuestionHow do 'chariots' mean a teacher?
- Responseרב יוסף's translation: a teacher's prayers protect better than an army
- QuestionWhere do we learn that these tears are never mended?
- Response'Into two pieces' means torn forever
- ChallengeBut אליהו did not die
- ResolutionTo אלישע, it was as if אליהו died
- QuestionWhere do we learn to tear for a נשיא, an אב בית דין, and bad news?
- Responseדוד tears for שאול and יהונתן
- ResponseMatching each part of the פסוק to a case
- ChallengeMaybe you tear only when all of these happen together
- ResolutionThe repeated word 'for' separates each case
- ChallengeDid שמואל not tear for terrible news?
- ResolutionOnly when most of the community is struck
- ChallengeDid שבור ever kill Jews?
- ResolutionThey brought it on themselves
- QuestionSource for tearing on hearing ה׳'s name cursed
- Responseחזקיהו's officials came with torn clothes
- StatementWho must tear on hearing ה׳ cursed
- ChallengeWhy not tear again when hearing it in court?
- ResolutionOnly the king tore, not the messengers
- QuestionSource that these tears are never sewn up
- ResponseLearned from the word 'tearing'
- QuestionSource for tearing over a burned ספר תורה
- Responseיהויקים burned ירמיהו's scroll
- QuestionWhat are 'three or four columns'?
- Responseיהויקים hears the first verses of איכה
- ResponseThe fifth פסוק and the burning of ה׳'s names
- ProofThey did not tear, so they should have torn
- ChallengeMaybe the tearing was for the bad news
- ResolutionThe bad news had not happened yet
- StatementTwo tears for a torn ספר תורה
- Statementרבי אבא's תפילין and the ostrich
- Statementרבי אבא thinks he would have needed two tears
- ChallengeWhere do you get that from?
- Rejectionשמואל: tearing applies only to destruction by force
- QuestionWhat is the source for tearing over the cities of Judah?
- ResponseMen came with torn clothes
- StatementWhat to say and tear for the cities, Jerusalem, and the Temple
- StatementTear for the Temple and extend it for Jerusalem
- ChallengeAnother teaching says two separate tears
- ResolutionIt depends on which place you reach first
- StatementLoose stitching is allowed but proper mending is not
- StatementIntroducing a statement of רב חסדא