Nedarim 79a
נדרים ע״ט ע״א
Learn Nedarim 79a step by step: Aramaic beside English, every question, answer and proof colour-coded.
Open Nedarim 79a in Gemara Clarity
Topic
A husband's silence about his wife's נדר: even silence meant to annoy her ratifies it (רבי חנינא is refuted); the start of a new פרק on which vows can be cancelled
Overview
This amud finishes a ברייתא about how a husband ratifies (הקם) or cancels (הפר) his wife's נדר. Silence and a silent decision in the heart can ratify, but they cannot cancel. The גמרא first tries to prove from this ברייתא that even silence meant to annoy the wife ratifies. It deflects that proof by explaining that the ברייתא means plain silence (שותק סתם). Next it asks where הפר is stronger than הקם. רבי יוחנן answers that a חכם can undo a הקם but not a הפר. Then רב כהנא, רבא and רב אשי each bring a source showing that silence ratifies even when it was not meant to ratify. Each challenge ends in תיובתא, so רבי חנינא's view that a husband silent to annoy can still cancel later is refuted. The פרק נערה המאורסה then closes. A new פרק opens with a משנה listing the vows a husband can cancel, starting with vows of עינוי נפש such as bathing and adorning oneself.
Opening lines
שֶׁהַשְּׁתִיקָה מְקַיֶּימֶת,
that silence ratifies,
וְאֵין שְׁתִיקָה מְבַטֶּלֶת.
but silence does not cancel.
קִיֵּים בְּלִבּוֹ — קַיָּים,
If he ratified in his heart, it is ratified,
הֵפֵר בְּלִבּוֹ — אֵינוֹ מוּפָר.
if he cancelled in his heart, it is not cancelled.
The steps (20)
- StatementThe ברייתא: silence can ratify but cannot cancel
- ChallengeDoes silence meant to annoy also ratify?
- ResolutionNo, it means silence in order to ratify
- ChallengeThat would repeat 'ratified in his heart'
- ResolutionIt means plain silence with no stated purpose
- QuestionWhere is cancelling stronger than ratifying?
- Responseרבי יוחנן: a הקם can be undone by a חכם, a הפר cannot
- Challengeרב כהנא challenges from a ברייתא on the פסוק
- QuestionThe ברייתא asks: annoy or ratify?
- ResponseThe ברייתא answers: one phrase is about silence to confirm, the other is about silence to annoy
- ConclusionThe ברייתא refutes the earlier view
- ChallengeWhy not read one phrase as silence to confirm and the other as plain silence?
- ResolutionThere are extra פסוקים about silence
- Challengeרבא's challenge from a נדר made close to nightfall
- Conclusionרבא's challenge is also a refutation
- Challengeרב אשי begins a challenge from a husband who did not know the law
- ChallengeWhy not treat the unaware husband like one silent to annoy?
- Conclusionרב אשי's challenge is a full refutation
- Conclusionהדרן — Closing פרק נערה המאורסה
- StatementNew פרק: vows of self-affliction can be cancelled