Sanhedrin 75a
סנהדרין ע״ה ע״א
Learn Sanhedrin 75a step by step: Aramaic beside English, every question, answer and proof colour-coded.
Open Sanhedrin 75a in Gemara Clarity
Topic
Whether a בן נח must give up his life for קידוש השם in public, and the story of the man who grew deathly ill from desire for a woman, where the חכמים ruled 'let him die' rather than allow any intimacy.
Overview
The amud opens by finishing an earlier question. Does אלישע's 'go in peace' to נעמן prove that a בן נח need not die for קידוש השם? The גמרא answers that נעמן's act was private, while the question is about public settings, so it stays open. Next, רב tells of a man deathly sick with desire for a woman. The חכמים said 'let him die' rather than allow even a talk behind a fence. The אמוראים explain why the חכמים were so strict even if she was a פנויה, and why marrying her would not have cured him. Then פרק בן סורר ומורה ends, and a new משנה lists those executed by שריפה, including the relatives in the category 'a woman and her daughter'. The גמרא reads the משנה's wording closely to see how it fits אביי and רבא. It then brings a ברייתא that uses the word 'זמה' to extend burning to more relatives. Finally it asks what 'males like females' means and challenges its own answer, and the discussion continues on the next amud.
Opening lines
וְאִם אִיתָא, לָא לֵימָא לֵיהּ?
And if it is so, he should not have said to him?
הָא בְּצִנְעָה, הָא בְּפַרְהֶסְיָא.
This was in private, that is in public.
אָמַר רַב יְהוּדָה אָמַר רַב:
Rav Yehuda said that Rav said:
מַעֲשֶׂה בְּאָדָם אֶחָד
There was an incident with a certain man
The steps (29)
- ChallengeWhy did אלישע tell נעמן 'go in peace'?
- RejectionPrivate versus public
- StatementThe lovesick man and the doctors
- StatementWas she married or single?
- ChallengeWhy so strict if she was single?
- Resolutionרב פפא: shame to the family
- Resolutionרב אחא בריה דרב איקא: guarding modesty
- ChallengeWhy not just marry her?
- ResolutionMarriage would not satisfy him
- ConclusionHadran — Closing בן סורר ומורה
- StatementNew משנה: who is executed by burning
- StatementWhich relatives count as 'a woman and her daughter'
- StatementThe wording shows both women are forbidden
- StatementThese two are written in the Torah, the rest come from a derivation
- StatementThis fits אביי: the משנה follows רבי עקיבא
- ChallengeBut according to רבא, whose view is the משנה?
- Resolutionרבא reads the משנה as 'a woman whose daughter he married'
- ChallengeThe second half of the משנה lists relatives who are already written in the Torah
- Resolutionאביי's answer: the written cases are listed alongside the father-in-law's mother
- Resolutionרבא's answer: only the mother-in-law is listed alongside the others
- QuestionAsking for the source of these laws
- ResponseA ברייתא quotes the verse and asks about the wife's daughter and granddaughters
- ResponseThe word 'זמה' links the two verses
- ResponseMales treated like females through the word זמה
- ResponseYounger and older generations treated alike in both פסוקים
- QuestionWhat does 'males like females' mean?
- RejectionIt cannot mean her son's daughter like her daughter's daughter
- ResponseIt means the father-in-law's mother like the mother-in-law's mother
- ChallengeThe base case itself has not been established yet