Shevuos 36b
שבועות ל״ו ע״ב
Shevuot 36b
Learn Shevuos 36b step by step: Aramaic beside English, every question, answer and proof colour-coded.
Open Shevuos 36b in Gemara Clarity
Topic
How רבי מאיר's view of 'מכלל לאו אתה שומע הן' is resolved, and the new משנה on שבועת הפקדון: who is liable, how many קרבנות, and the rule that a קנס brings no liability
Overview
The amud opens by finishing the question of whether רבי מאיר accepts the rule 'מכלל לאו אתה שומע הן', inferring a positive from a negative. The גמרא first reverses the opinions in the משנה and says רבי מאיר rejects the rule even in איסור. רבינא attacks this from the drunk and long-haired כהנים, whose death penalty is learned exactly this way. The final answer keeps the reversal: רבי מאיר rejects the rule only in money matters, and סוטה counts as an איסור that involves money. After the הדרן for פרק שבועת העדות, a new משנה begins about שבועת הפקדון, a false oath denying someone's money or property. It explains who is bound by this oath, the argument between רבי מאיר and חכמים about needing a בית דין, which states of mind bring an אשם, and how many קרבנות are owed for repeated oaths, several claimants, or several items. It ends with cases of a קנס and the general rule: a person is liable only if his own admission would have made him pay. The גמרא then opens with a story about three students in רבה's study hall, and רב כהנא's question continues on the next amud.
Opening lines
אֶלָּא אֵיפוֹךְ –
Rather, reverse it:
אֲפִילּוּ בְּאִיסּוּרָא לֵית לֵיהּ.
even in ritual matters he does not accept it.
מַתְקֵיף לֵיהּ רָבִינָא:
Ravina objected to it:
וּבְאִיסּוּרָא לֵית לֵיהּ?!
And in ritual matters he does not accept it?!
The steps (25)
- ResolutionReverse the opinions: רבי מאיר rejects the rule even in איסור
- Challengeרבינא challenges: the drunk and long-haired כהנים are liable to death
- ResolutionFinal answer: reverse the opinions; רבי מאיר rejects the rule only in money, and סוטה involves money
- ConclusionHadran — Closing פרק שבועת העדות
- StatementThe deposit oath applies to everyone
- Statementרבי מאיר: an oath imposed by others counts only in court
- StatementThe Sages: once he denied, he is liable
- StatementWhich mistakes count, and the guilt offering
- StatementHow the oath of deposit happens
- StatementFive oaths bring five liabilities
- Statementרבי שמעון explains why each oath counts
- StatementFive claimants: one general oath or separate denials
- StatementHow clearly must the word 'oath' be said?
- StatementSeveral kinds of items: one denial or many
- StatementWheat, barley and spelt: a general oath versus naming each item
- Statementרבי מאיר: even single grains count separately
- StatementFalsely denying that he raped or seduced the daughter
- Statementרבי שמעון exempts him because a fine is not paid by admission
- ChallengeThe חכמים answer: shame and damage are real money
- StatementStolen ox: denying the theft versus denying the slaughter or sale
- StatementOx that killed an ox versus ox that killed a slave
- StatementDenying an injury under oath: liable
- StatementDenying knocking out a slave's tooth or eye: exempt
- ConclusionThe general rule: paying based on your own admission
- StatementThree students learning in רבה's study hall meet רב כהנא