Yevamos 29b
יבמות כ״ט ע״ב
Yevamot 29b
Learn Yevamos 29b step by step: Aramaic beside English, every question, answer and proof colour-coded.
Open Yevamos 29b in Gemara Clarity
Topic
The strength of מאמר according to בית שמאי: whether it pushes away the צרה fully, and whether it makes נישואין or only אירוסין
Overview
The amud asks how strong מאמר, a יבם's verbal betrothal of his יבמה, is according to בית שמאי. An attempted proof from the two-sisters משנה fails, because a מאמר given where יבום is forbidden has no power at all. In רב אשי's version, רבי אלעזר says that for בית שמאי מאמר pushes away the צרה but leaves a remnant, so she still needs חליצה. רבי אבין supports this from the two-sisters משנה. The three-brothers משנה seems to show a full pushing away. The גמרא resolves this: a יבמה fit for full יבום gets a full-strength מאמר, and one who is not fit does not. Then רבה asks whether מאמר makes נישואין or only אירוסין. After אביי's challenges, the practical question becomes whether she still needs a חופה. The גמרא tries to answer from a משנה about a יבם cancelling a שומרת יבם's vows. Two answers block the proof: he may cancel only together with her father, or he cancels alone because the court made him support her.
Opening lines
וְאִי סָלְקָא דַּעְתָּךְ
And if it enters your mind
מַאֲמָר לְבֵית שַׁמַּאי
that levirate betrothal, according to Beit Shammai,
קוֹנֶה קִנְיָן גָּמוּר:
acquires as a complete acquisition,
זֶה יַעֲשֶׂה מַאֲמָר וְיִקְנֶה,
then this one should perform levirate betrothal and acquire,
The steps (23)
- ProofAttempted proof that מאמר does not fully acquire for בית שמאי
- ChallengeThe same argument would disprove full pushing away
- Rejectionמאמר only works where יבום is permitted, so there is no proof
- Statementרב אשי's version: מאמר pushes away but leaves a remnant
- Proofרבי אבין brings support from the משנה of 'they may keep them'
- ChallengeBut another משנה shows מאמר fully pushes away
- ResolutionA fully fit יבמה gets a full-strength מאמר
- Questionרבה asks: is מאמר marriage or betrothal?
- Questionאביי asks: what law would this matter for?
- ChallengeIt can't be about inheritance, טומאה or vows
- Questionרבה's question is about bringing her to the wedding canopy
- Challengeאביי: she can be taken even against her will, so a canopy cannot be needed
- Resolutionרבה: maybe מאמר replaces the levirate bond with a betrothal bond
- ProofCome and hear: cancelling the vows of a woman waiting for her יבם
- ChallengeRecalling the difficulty with רבי אליעזר's view
- ResolutionThe case is after מאמר, following בית שמאי
- ProofAttempted proof that מאמר creates full marriage
- RejectionHe cancels only together with the father
- ChallengeHow does this fit רבי אלעזר's view of מאמר?
- Resolutionרבי אלעזר's limit was about חליצה, not vows
- ChallengeThe משנה says 'he cancels,' not 'they cancel'
- ResolutionThe case is where the court ordered him to support her
- StatementA woman vows with the agreement of the one who supports her