Bava Basra 145a
בבא בתרא קמ״ה ע״א
Bava Batra 145a
Learn Bava Basra 145a step by step: Aramaic beside English, every question, answer and proof colour-coded.
Open Bava Basra 145a in Gemara Clarity
Topic
The claim 'give me my husband', whether קידושין money and gifts are returned when a betrothal ends, and the rules of שושבינות gifts.
Overview
The גמרא asks why the one who received שושבינות gifts can't say 'give me my groomsman', the way a betrothed woman can say 'give me my husband'. רב יוסף answers that the seven days of rejoicing already took place, so the debt is already owed. The גמרא then asks whether the claim 'give me my husband' is a dispute between תנאים, using a ברייתא of רבי נתן and רבי יהודה הנשיא. It concludes that everyone accepts the claim. The real argument is whether קידושין money is given to be kept for good (לטיבועין). A second ברייתא with רבי מאיר, רבי יהודה and רבי יוסי is explained as the same argument, about a כהן's betrothed who was forced; רבי יוסי splits the money because he is unsure. The אמוראים then rule in practice: gifts come back but the קידושין money does not, unless she backs out. אמימר holds the קידושין money is never returned, so people won't think he may marry her sister, and the גמרא rejects רב אשי's answer to this. Finally the גמרא returns to the משנה and begins a ברייתא listing five rules about שושבינות, which continues on the next amud.
Opening lines
״תְּנוּ לִי בַּעְלִי וְאֶשְׂמַח עִמּוֹ״.
"Give me my husband and I will rejoice with him."
הָכָא נָמֵי, נֵימָא:
Here too, let him say:
״תְּנוּ לִי שׁוֹשְׁבִינִי וְאֶשְׂמַח עִמּוֹ״!
"Give me my groomsman and I will rejoice with him!"
אָמַר רַב יוֹסֵף:
Rav Yosef said:
The steps (25)
- ChallengeWhy can't he say "Give me my groomsman"?
- Resolutionרב יוסף: the rejoicing already happened
- QuestionIs "Give me my husband" a dispute between תנאים?
- ChallengeThe two opinions sound the same
- ResponseMaybe they argue about "Give me my husband"
- ResponseFilling in the missing words of the ברייתא: רבי נתן's view
- ResponseFilling in the missing words: רבי יהודה הנשיא's view
- RejectionEveryone accepts her claim; the real dispute is whether קידושין money is meant to be kept
- ChallengeBut רבי יהודה הנשיא mentions a custom of returning
- ResolutionHe is talking about the presents, not the קידושין money
- StatementA second ברייתא with the same kind of dispute
- QuestionWhat case is this ברייתא about? Not if she died
- RejectionNot if he died either
- RejectionNot an ordinary betrothed woman who sinned
- ResponseThe answer: a כהן's betrothed who was forced
- ConclusionWhy רבי יוסי splits the money
- StatementLocal custom decides whether betrothal money is returned
- QuestionWhat is the rule in the rest of Babylonia
- ResponseGifts are returned, betrothal money is not
- ConclusionThe final ruling depends on who ended the marriage
- StatementBetrothal money is not returned, so people won't think he may marry her sister
- RejectionHer divorce document proves she was married
- Rejectionרב אשי's answer is rejected
- StatementBack to the משנה: groomsmen's gifts can be collected in court
- StatementA ברייתא lists five rules about groomsmen's gifts