Gemara Clarity

Bava Basra 19a

בבא בתרא י״ט ע״א

Bava Batra 19a

Learn Bava Basra 19a step by step: Aramaic beside English, every question, answer and proof colour-coded.

Open Bava Basra 19a in Gemara Clarity

Topic

Distancing damaging things from a neighbor's wall: launderers' ponds, plaster with lime, rocks versus sand, and seeds versus plowing

Overview

The עמוד opens with the last line of an earlier discussion about bees and a neighbor's mustard plants. Next comes the משנה's rule about a launderers' pond. רב נחמן says the three טפחים applies only to a soaking pond (מחמצן), while a washing pond (נדיין) needs four אמות. This is first proven from a ברייתא, then retold as a contradiction that his distinction resolves. The גמרא then asks whether the משנה says 'and plasters with lime' or 'or plasters with lime'. Two proofs are tried, and each one is pushed aside. Next the גמרא compares our משנה's list of heat-producing materials with a list in מסכת שבת and asks why one mentions rocks and the other sand. After answers from רב יוסף and אביי are rejected, רבא explains that rocks scratch pots and dry sand does not harm walls, and it is defended against a ברייתא about damp sand. Finally the גמרא explains why the משנה lists seeds, a plow and water separately, and begins a new question about seeds that continues on the next עמוד.

Opening lines

לָא מַשְׁכַּחַתְּ לֵיהּ,

[the bees] will not find it;

אִי בְּטַרְפָּא – הָדַר פָּארֵי.

if [they eat] a leaf – it grows back.

וְלֹא נִבְרֶכֶת הַכּוֹבְסִין וְכוּ׳.

[The משנה says:] Nor a launderers' pond, etc.

אָמַר רַב נַחְמָן אָמַר רַבָּה בַּר אֲבוּהּ:

Rav Naḥman said in the name of Rabba bar Avuh:

The steps (31)

  1. ResolutionWhy bees don't really harm the mustard
  2. StatementSoaking pond needs three handbreadths, washing pond needs four cubits
  3. ProofA ברייתא supports רב נחמן
  4. ChallengeSecond version: the משנה and ברייתא contradict each other
  5. Resolutionרב נחמן resolves it with the two kinds of ponds
  6. StatementThe משנה is read as saying 'soaking pond' outright
  7. QuestionDoes the משנה say 'and plaster' or 'or plaster'?
  8. ProofIt must be 'and plasters', or the cases would have been combined
  9. RejectionThe cases may be separate because the damage is different
  10. Proofרבי יהודה requires plaster only for crumbly rock
  11. RejectionCrumbly rock is mentioned only to rule out a bigger distance
  12. StatementOur משנה's list compared to the list in שבת
  13. QuestionWhy rocks here and sand there?
  14. Responseרב יוסף: people don't wrap pots in rocks
  15. Challengeאביי: people don't usually wrap pots in fancy wool either
  16. Resolutionאביי: each list hints at the other
  17. Challengeרבא: then put the full list in one place
  18. Resolutionרבא's own answer: rocks damage pots, sand doesn't damage walls
  19. ChallengeA ברייתא does list sand
  20. ResolutionThe ברייתא means damp sand
  21. ChallengeThen our משנה should list damp sand too
  22. ResolutionThe water channel already covers dampness
  23. ChallengeBut the משנה lists two water cases anyway
  24. ResolutionBoth water cases are needed, each for its own reason
  25. ChallengeWhy mention seeds if the plow rule already covers them?
  26. ResolutionSeeds can be planted without plowing
  27. ChallengeWhy mention the plow if the seed rule already covers it?
  28. ResolutionPlowing can be done for trees
  29. ChallengeTrees need water, so the water rule should cover it
  30. ResolutionIn ארץ ישראל, trees drink rainwater
  31. QuestionOpening a new question about seeds