Bava Kamma 34a
בבא קמא ל״ד ע״א
Learn Bava Kamma 34a step by step: Aramaic beside English, every question, answer and proof colour-coded.
Open Bava Kamma 34a in Gemara Clarity
Topic
How damage is valued when an ox's worth changes, and how רבי מאיר and רבי יהודה read 'divide the live ox and the dead'
Overview
The amud opens by finishing a discussion about a creditor who grabs an ox that did damage. The גמרא rejects the idea that a later creditor who collects first loses what he took. The ox case is special, because the injured party collects from that very ox wherever it is. Next, a ברייתא teaches when damage is valued. If the hurt ox later rises in value, we go by the time of the damage. If it drops because of the wound, we go by the time of court. The גמרא explains the ruling about the damaging ox according to רבי עקיבא, who holds that the two owners are partners, by saying its owner fattened it. Then a new משנה brings the argument between רבי מאיר and רבי יהודה about which case the פסוק 'sell the live ox and divide its money, and the dead too they shall divide' describes. רבא shows that they really differ about who carries a drop in the carcass's value. אביי begins to challenge him, and that challenge continues on the next amud.
Opening lines
וַאֲפִילּוּ הִזִּיק עַד שֶׁלֹּא חָב –
And even if it did damage before he owed money,
בַּעַל חוֹב קְדֵים!
the creditor came first!
שְׁמַע מִינַּהּ,
Learn from this,
בַּעַל חוֹב מְאוּחָר שֶׁקָּדַם וְגָבָה –
that a later creditor who went ahead and collected,
The steps (23)
- ProofTrying to learn a rule about a later creditor who collects first
- RejectionRejecting the inference: the ox case is special
- StatementA ברייתא: if the hurt ox gains value, we use the value at the time of damage
- StatementIf the hurt ox loses value, we use the value at the time of the court case
- StatementThe damaging ox goes up or down in value
- QuestionWhose opinion is the first ruling?
- ChallengeThe second ruling fits רבי עקיבא, so the ברייתא is split
- ResolutionIt is all רבי עקיבא: the owner fattened the ox
- ChallengeIf it means fattened, the first clause is too obvious
- ResolutionThe first clause covers both cases, the last clause only fattening
- QuestionWhy did the hurt ox get weaker?
- RejectionIt cannot mean it got weaker from work
- ResponseIt got weaker from the wound itself
- StatementNew משנה: רבי מאיר applies the פסוק to an ox whose carcass is worthless
- Challengeרבי יהודה agrees with the money result but says the reading skips part of the פסוק
- Responseרבי יהודה's own case: the carcass is worth fifty זוז
- StatementA ברייתא gives רבי יהודה's view in full
- StatementIn the ברייתא, רבי מאיר says the תורה's case is the worthless carcass
- Questionרבי מאיר asks himself how he explains 'the dead too they shall divide'
- Responseרבי מאיר: the loss caused by the death is split and paid from the live ox
- QuestionIf both opinions give each side 125, what is the difference?
- ResponseThey disagree about who absorbs a drop in the carcass's value
- Challengeאביי begins to challenge רבא's explanation of רבי יהודה