Bava Kamma 50a
בבא קמא נ׳ ע״א
Learn Bava Kamma 50a step by step: Aramaic beside English, every question, answer and proof colour-coded.
Open Bava Kamma 50a in Gemara Clarity
Topic
Liability for a בור according to רבה and רב יוסף, נחוניא the well-digger, and God's exact judgment of צדיקים
Overview
The amud continues the argument between רבי ישמעאל and רבי עקיבא about who is liable for a בור. According to רבה, they argue about a pit on one's own property: רבי עקיבא reads "בעל הבור" as a pit that has an owner, while רבי ישמעאל reads it as the one who made the hazard. רב יוסף disagrees. He says everyone holds a person liable for a pit on private property, and the real argument is about a pit in רשות הרבים. There, רבי ישמעאל learns liability from the words "opens" and "digs", while רבי עקיבא says both words are needed for other lessons. Two ברייתות are brought to challenge the readings, and each time the גמרא shows how both רבה and רב יוסף can explain them. Next, a ברייתא teaches that someone who digs a well and hands it over to the public is exempt, and נחוניא the well-digger is praised for doing exactly that. The amud ends with stories and lessons about how exactly הקדוש ברוך הוא judges צדיקים, and a new teaching on a פסוק that continues on the next amud.
Opening lines
בְּבוֹר בִּרְשׁוּתוֹ –
[they argue] about a pit on his own property –
רַבִּי עֲקִיבָא סָבַר:
Rabbi Akiva holds:
בּוֹר בִּרְשׁוּתוֹ נָמֵי חַיָּיב,
a pit on his own property also makes him liable,
דִּכְתִיב: ״בַּעַל הַבּוֹר״ –
as it is written: "The owner of the pit" –
The steps (33)
- Statementרבה: רבי עקיבא holds a pit in one's own property also makes him liable
- Statementרבה: רבי ישמעאל reads the verse as the one responsible for the hazard
- ChallengeWhat does רבי עקיבא mean by 'This is the pit stated in the Torah'?
- ResolutionIt means the pit the Torah mentions first for payment
- Statementרב יוסף: everyone agrees a pit on private property makes him liable
- StatementWhere they really argue: a pit in the public area
- Resolutionרבי עקיבא: both words are needed, first reason
- Resolutionרבי עקיבא: both words are needed, second reason
- ChallengeHow does רב יוסף explain 'this is the Torah's pit'?
- ResolutionIt is the first pit the פסוק mentions
- ChallengeA ברייתא: pit under the street, opening into private property
- ChallengeMore cases: pit opening onto the street, and pits dug for foundations
- ChallengeInference: digging next to the street for any other purpose makes one liable
- QuestionWhose view is the ברייתא? It fits רבה easily
- ChallengeAccording to רב יוסף, the first clause seems to match no one
- Resolutionרב יוסף: the first clause is about someone who gave up nothing
- Statementרב אשי: רבה does not need to split the ברייתא either
- ResolutionThe whole ברייתא follows רבי ישמעאל
- ChallengeA new ברייתא about a pit opening into the public domain
- ChallengeThe last clause seems to fit no תנא for רב יוסף
- ResolutionThe last clause is about digging for foundations
- StatementHanding a dug well over to the public
- Proofנחוניא the well-digger followed this rule
- ChallengeOnly this one הלכה?
- ResolutionRead it as "even this הלכה"
- Statementנחוניא's daughter falls into a pit
- StatementThe daughter explains how she was rescued
- QuestionPeople ask רבי חנינא בן דוסא if he is a prophet
- ResponseNot prophecy, but reasoning about a צדיק's merit
- StatementEven so, נחוניא's son died of thirst
- ProofA second פסוק for the same idea
- StatementNever say God simply lets things go
- QuestionOpening a question about a פסוק