Kereisos 17b
כריתות י״ז ע״ב
Keritot 17b
Learn Kereisos 17b step by step: Aramaic beside English, every question, answer and proof colour-coded.
Open Kereisos 17b in Gemara Clarity
Topic
When an אשם תלוי is brought: the משנה's doubt cases, and whether a single doubtful piece is enough or two pieces are needed
Overview
The amud opens with the end of a משנה about the אשם תלוי, the offering brought when a person is unsure whether he sinned. The משנה gives three classic doubt cases: two pieces of fat, his wife and his sister, and שבת and a weekday. It then rules that אשם תלוי offerings are counted just like חטאת offerings. In the גמרא, רב אסי and חייא בר רב argue whether the משנה means a single doubtful piece or one piece out of two. Their argument depends on whether we follow the spelling of the word מצות (singular) or its reading מצוות (plural). רב rules that one of two pieces obligates an אשם תלוי, while a single doubtful piece exempts. רבא explains this from the plural reading. Sources that require an אשם תלוי for a single doubt, such as the כוי, the יבם's doubtful child and the blood found on the cloth, are answered as following רבי אליעזר. רבי זירא gives a different reason: the doubt must be one that can be checked. The two reasons differ in a case of an olive-size piece and a half-olive piece.
Opening lines
אֵין בּוֹ,
there is not in it
שׁוּמָּן וָחֵלֶב לְפָנָיו,
permitted fat and forbidden fat are before him
וְאָכַל אֶחָד מֵהֶן
and he ate one of them
וְאֵינוֹ יוֹדֵעַ אֵיזֶה מֵהֶן אָכַל,
and he does not know which of them he ate
The steps (29)
- StatementFinishing the previous rule: even without a full measure
- StatementThree doubt cases that require an uncertain guilt offering
- StatementOne lapse of awareness means only one uncertain guilt offering
- StatementAwareness in between means an offering for each
- StatementDifferent kinds of forbidden food mean a separate אשם תלוי for each
- StatementDispute: one doubtful piece or one piece out of two
- QuestionWhat is the root of their disagreement?
- ResponseSpelling versus reading of the word מצות
- ChallengeChallenge to רב אסי from the end of the משנה
- Rejectionרב deflects the proof: the two clauses can differ
- ChallengeThen why mention two pieces at all?
- ResolutionThe style of 'this, and no need to say that'
- ChallengeFor חייא בר רב: why two clauses?
- ResolutionThe second clause explains the first
- Statementרב's ruling: two pieces obligate, one doubtful piece exempts
- Statementרבא explains the source for רב's rule
- Challengeאביי objects from רבי אליעזר's ruling on a כוי
- Resolutionרבי אליעזר follows the written spelling
- ChallengeA new challenge from a child of doubtful father
- ChallengeThe ברייתא ends by requiring an אָשָׁם תָּלוּי
- ResolutionThe ברייתא follows רבי אליעזר
- ChallengeA challenge from the משנה about blood found on the cloth
- ResolutionThis source also follows רבי אליעזר
- Statementרבי חייא quotes רב: two pieces obligate, one piece exempts
- Statementרבי זירא's reason for רב: two pieces can be checked
- QuestionWhat is the practical difference between רבא's and רבי זירא's reasons?
- ResponseThe difference: one olive-size piece and one half-olive piece
- Challengeרבי ירמיה's challenge from the fat of a כוי
- Resolutionרבי אליעזר does not require a checkable doubt