Kesubos 19b
כתובות י״ט ע״ב
Ketubot 19b
Learn Kesubos 19b step by step: Aramaic beside English, every question, answer and proof colour-coded.
Open Kesubos 19b in Gemara Clarity
Topic
Witnesses who weaken their own document (אמנה, מודעא, condition), keeping an עולה at home, and outsiders who confirm dead signers' handwriting
Overview
The amud opens with רב ששת בריה דרב אידי, who learns from רב כהנא that witnesses who say their document was only a שטר אמנה are not believed, because witnesses would not sign an עולה. The פסוק 'ואל תשכן באהליך עולה' then teaches that one may not keep a שטר פרוע, a שטר אמנה, or an unproofread ספר at home. רב נחמן rules that witnesses who claim אמנה or מודעא are not believed. מר בר רב אשי says a מודעא claim is believed, since such a document may be written. רב נחמן tells רבא that witnesses who mention a condition are believed: the parties must fulfill the condition first. When only one witness mentions a condition, רב פפא says one cannot outweigh two. רב הונא בריה דרב יהושע disagrees and says that witness undoes his own testimony, and the הלכה follows him. Finally, a ברייתא about outsiders who identify dead signers' handwriting raises a 'two against two' question, and רב ששת begins answering that a הכחשה is the start of a הזמה. His answer continues on the next amud.
Opening lines
וְאָמַר רַב שֵׁשֶׁת בְּרֵיהּ דְּרַב אִידִי:
And Rav Sheshet son of Rav Idi said:
שְׁמַע מִינַּהּ מִדְּרַב כָּהֲנָא,
Learn from Rav Kahana's statement:
עֵדִים שֶׁאָמְרוּ ״אֲמָנָה הָיוּ דְּבָרֵינוּ״ —
witnesses who said, "Our words were a matter of trust"
אֵין נֶאֱמָנִין.
are not believed.
The steps (22)
- StatementWitnesses who claim the document was only a trust document are not believed
- QuestionWhy are they not believed?
- ResponseHonest witnesses do not sign something false
- StatementDo not keep a paid-up loan document at home
- StatementIn ארץ ישראל, רב's reading of both halves of the verse
- ConclusionComparing the opinions: paid-up documents versus trust documents
- StatementAn unproofread ספר may be kept only thirty days
- StatementWitnesses who claim trust or a hidden protest are not believed
- StatementA second view splits the two cases
- QuestionWhy the difference?
- ResponseOne document may be written, the other may not
- QuestionWhat if the witnesses say there was a condition?
- ResponseGo fulfill your condition first
- QuestionOne witness says there was a condition, the other says there was none
- ResponseOne witness cannot outweigh two
- ChallengeThen even two witnesses saying condition should not count
- StatementMentioning a condition undoes your own testimony
- ConclusionThe הלכה follows רב הונא בריה דרב יהושע
- StatementWitnesses who confirm the handwriting can also cancel the document
- StatementWhen the handwriting is already confirmed, they are not believed
- ChallengeWhy can the document collect? It is two against two
- Resolutionרב ששת: contradiction is the start of הזמה