Kesubos 27a
כתובות כ״ז ע״א
Ketubot 27a
Learn Kesubos 27a step by step: Aramaic beside English, every question, answer and proof colour-coded.
Open Kesubos 27a in Gemara Clarity
Topic
Women held by non-Jews: money versus capital cases, and wives of כהנים in a captured city, including when a hiding place saves them.
Overview
Our משנה says a woman held by non-Jews over money stays permitted to her husband, but one held over a capital case is forbidden. The גמרא tests רב's limit, that the money rule applies only when the Jews' hand is strong, against the Ashkelon testimony in עדויות, told in three versions. In the end, רב שמואל בר רב יצחק explains that the משנה speaks of a time when the Jews are strong, and Ashkelon of a time when the non-Jews are fully in control. For the capital case, רב and לוי give examples, and חזקיה and רבי יוחנן argue whether the death sentence must already be final. A new משנה rules that wives of כהנים in a city captured by a siege army are forbidden unless witnesses, even a slave or maidservant, testify for them. The גמרא raises a contradiction from wine barrels in wartime and answers it in two ways: soldiers find time for desire but not for idol wine, or the city's own army is different from a foreign army. Then a single hiding place is said to save all the wives. רבי ירמיה asks what happens if it fits only one woman, and the comparison to the two-paths case is rejected, since here maybe no woman was harmed at all. The amud ends as רב אשי asks about a woman who says she did not hide and was not defiled; the discussion continues on the next amud.
Opening lines
הוּרְהֲנָה — אִין,
If she was taken as security, yes [she needs witnesses],
נֶחְבְּשָׁה — לָא.
if she was imprisoned, no.
הוּא הַדִּין אֲפִילּוּ נֶחְבְּשָׁה.
The same law applies even if she was imprisoned.
וּמַעֲשֶׂה שֶׁהָיָה, כָּךְ הָיָה.
And the incident that happened, happened that way.
The steps (27)
- ChallengeTaken as security is different from imprisoned
- ResolutionImprisonment is the same; the story just happened that way
- ProofSecond version: רבא supports רב from the Ashkelon case
- StatementThe Sages' argument to the family
- ProofEven over money, she needed witnesses
- RejectionTaken as security is a special case
- ChallengeThird version: the Ashkelon case contradicts our משנה
- ResolutionIt depends on who holds power
- StatementWhich capital cases does the משנה mean?
- StatementMust the death sentence already be final?
- StatementWives of כהנים in a conquered city
- ChallengeWartime wine barrels seem to contradict the משנה
- ResolutionTime for sin, but no time for idol wine
- ResolutionSame government versus a foreign government
- ChallengeOne soldier could still slip away
- ResolutionThe guards can see each other
- ChallengeThe guards might doze off
- ResolutionA city sealed with chains, dogs, branches and geese
- StatementTwo sages, two ways of reading the same answer
- StatementOne hiding place saves all the women
- QuestionWhat if the hiding place fits only one woman?
- ChallengeComparing to the case of two paths
- Statementרבי יהודה and רבי יוסי argue about the two paths
- StatementWhere exactly רבי יהודה and רבי יוסי disagree
- ChallengePermitting every wife counts as 'at the same time'
- RejectionThe two-paths case is different because there the impurity is certain
- QuestionWhat if a woman says she neither hid nor was defiled?