Niddah 33b
נדה ל״ג ע״ב
Learn Niddah 33b step by step: Aramaic beside English, every question, answer and proof colour-coded.
Open Niddah 33b in Gemara Clarity
Topic
A זבה's discharge of semen, תרומה and garments touched by a כותי, and the status of צדוקי women
Overview
The עמוד opens by finishing רמי בר חמא's question: does a זבה who discharges semen during her seven clean days lose her count? רבא tries to show the question cannot work, but the גמרא answers him using the זב, whose 'unbroken days' rule only blocks זיבה. So the question stands. Next, the גמרא tells how רב פפא visited רב שמואל, who served him a bull and pointed out a clash between two משניות. One משנה does not burn תרומה over the garments of a כותי, while the other burns תרומה over the uncertain garments of an עם הארץ. רב פפא's answer (a כותי חבר) is rejected. רב שימי בר אשי then explains the case as a naked כותי who went to the מקוה, which leaves only a ספק ספיקא. A new משנה discusses צדוקי women. The גמרא proves from רבי יוסי's words that for the תנא קמא, a צדוקי woman whose practice is unknown is like a כותית. Finally, a ברייתא tells of a צדוקי's spit landing on the כהן גדול. The גמרא asks why the spit was not impure simply as an עם הארץ's. אביי answers, רבא rejects his answer, and רבא's own answer continues on the next עמוד.
Opening lines
אוֹ דִילְמָא נוֹגַעַת הָיְתָה
Or perhaps she was touching
וְלָא סָתְרָה?
and she did not break her count?
אָמַר רָבָא:
Rava said:
לְפוּם חוּרְפָּא שַׁבֶּשְׁתָּא!
According to the sharpness is the error!
The steps (30)
- QuestionThe second side of the question: maybe she is only 'touching' semen
- Rejectionרבא: she cannot lose all seven days
- Rejectionרבא: she cannot lose just one day either
- ChallengeThe same problem would apply to a זב, yet he loses one day
- ChallengeThe same reading applies to a woman, so one day is possible
- StatementQuoting the next line of the משנה
- Statementרב פפא arrives in town and hears about רב שמואל
- Statementרב פפא concludes רב שמואל is God-fearing and visits him
- StatementFirst side of the contradiction: no burning תרומה over a doubt
- ChallengeSecond side: a משנה that does burn תרומה over a doubt
- Resolutionרב פפא answers that the case is a careful כותי
- Challengeרב שמואל objects that a חבר would not be called a בועל נדה
- Resolutionרב שימי בר אשי gives a better answer
- ProofWhy this case is only a doubt
- ProofEven recent relations only add a second doubt
- ChallengeBut the clothes of an עם הארץ are impure anyway
- ResolutionThe כותי was naked
- Statementמשנה: the status of צדוקי women
- QuestionWhat if we do not know her practice?
- ProofThe first clause suggests she is like a Jewish woman
- RejectionThe last clause suggests the opposite
- ConclusionNothing can be learned from this משנה
- ProofProof from רבי יוסי's words about the unknown case
- ConclusionThe גמרא accepts the proof
- StatementA צדוקי's spit lands on the כהן גדול
- ResponseThe wife: צדוקי wives show their blood to the חכמים
- Statementרבי יוסי's testimony about his neighbors
- ChallengeWhy not worry about the spit of an עם הארץ?
- Resolutionאביי: the צדוקי was a חבר
- Rejectionרבא: a man suspected with a נדה is no חבר