Shabbos 100a
שבת ק׳ ע״א
Shabbat 100a
Learn Shabbos 100a step by step: Aramaic beside English, every question, answer and proof colour-coded.
Open Shabbos 100a in Gemara Clarity
Topic
Throwing on שבת: when an object counts as resting (on water, a wall, a hole, or after rolling) and what creates or cancels a רשות היחיד (pits, holes, mounds)
Overview
The amud opens by finishing a point: an object floating on water is not considered 'resting' (הנחה). רבא asks about a nut resting in a floating vessel, and the question stays unresolved (תיקו). The גמרא notes that oil floating on wine is already a מחלוקת between רבי יוחנן בן נורי and the רבנן. אביי then rules on pits in the רשות הרבים: a thrown mat that divides a pit cancels its walls, and water filling a pit does not cancel them but fruit does. A ברייתא of רבי שמעון about throwing into the sea supports him. A new משנה teaches that an object hitting a wall below ten טפחים counts as landing, and רבי יוחנן explains that this means a sticky fig-cake. Related teachings cover an object landing in a small hole (the מחלוקת about חוקקין להשלים) and a gradual mound that counts as a wall. A second משנה deals with thrown objects that roll after landing, and רבי יוחנן and a ברייתא require that the object actually rested for a moment. רבא adds that for the רבנן even an object within three טפחים of the ground must truly rest, and רבינא begins to question מרימר about this. His question continues on the next amud.
Opening lines
לָאו הַיְינוּ הַנָּחָתָן.
that is not considered their placement.
בָּעֵי רָבָא:
Rava asked:
אֱגוֹז בִּכְלִי
a nut in a vessel
וּכְלִי צָף עַל גַּבֵּי מַיִם — מַהוּ?
and the vessel floats on water, what is the law?
The steps (25)
- ConclusionFloating on water is not resting
- Questionרבא's question: a nut in a floating vessel
- ConclusionThe question stays unresolved
- StatementOil on wine is a known dispute
- ProofThe source: a טבול יום touching oil on wine
- Statementאביי: a pit eight wide and a mat
- StatementFor אביי, dirt surely cancels the walls
- StatementFor רבי יוחנן, a mat surely does not
- Statementאביי: a pit full of water vs. full of fruit
- QuestionWhy the difference?
- ResponseWater does not cancel the walls; fruit does
- Proofברייתא support: throwing into the sea
- StatementThrowing at a wall above or below ten handbreadths
- ChallengeBut the object did not come to rest
- ResolutionThe case is a sticky fig-cake
- StatementLanding in a tiny hole above ten depends on a dispute
- ProofA ברייתא confirms the dispute about the hole
- StatementA gradual mound counts as a wall
- ProofA ברייתא about a sloped alleyway supports רב
- StatementA thrown object that rolls into or out of ארבע אמות
- ChallengeBut the object never came to rest
- ResolutionIt briefly rested on something
- ProofA ברייתא about wind supports רבי יוחנן
- StatementWithin three טפחים, the רבנן still require real resting
- Questionרבינא is about to respond to מרימר