Gemara Clarity

Yevamos 116b

יבמות קט״ז ע״ב

Yevamot 116b

Learn Yevamos 116b step by step: Aramaic beside English, every question, answer and proof colour-coded.

Open Yevamos 116b in Gemara Clarity

Topic

When a woman is believed that her husband died: a קטטה, רבי יהודה's signs of grief, whether the rule is limited to the original incident, and whether she collects her כתובה.

Overview

The amud opens by finishing a discussion about a wife who had a קטטה with her husband. The גמרא then asks whether a single witness is believed in such a case, and the question ends as a תיקו. Next, the רבנן reject רבי יהודה's demand that a woman come crying with torn clothes, because a clever woman could fake it. A story at רבי יהודה's court shows people coaching a woman, and the גמרא explains they were not teaching her to lie. A new משנה brings בית הלל, who limit the woman's believability to cases like the original incident at the harvest. בית שמאי argue that the details only describe what happened, and בית הלל change their ruling. The גמרא tells the original snake-bite story. It then tests whether the מחלוקת of רבי חנניא בן עקיבא and the רבנן about carrying מי חטאת across the ירדן matches בית שמאי and בית הלל, and concludes that each case has its own reason. Finally, a new משנה asks whether the woman may collect her כתובה, and בית הלל's answer to בית שמאי's קל וחומר continues on the next amud.

Opening lines

אִיכָּא בֵּינַיְיהוּ

There is a difference between them

דְּאַרְגֵּיל הוּא קְטָטָה.

where he started the quarrel.

אִיבַּעְיָא לְהוּ:

A question was asked before them:

עֵד אֶחָד בִּקְטָטָה, מַהוּ?

one witness in a case of a quarrel, what is the law?

The steps (30)

  1. ConclusionThe practical difference: when the husband started the quarrel
  2. QuestionIs a single witness believed when there was a quarrel?
  3. QuestionThe two sides: why is one witness trusted in the first place?
  4. ConclusionThe question stays unresolved
  5. StatementQuoting רבי יהודה's view in the משנה
  6. ChallengeThe רבנן object: a clever woman gains and a simple one loses
  7. ConclusionThe רבנן conclude: both women may remarry
  8. StatementA story: people coach a woman at רבי יהודה's court
  9. ChallengeDid they teach her to lie?
  10. ResolutionThey held like the רבנן and only wanted to smooth her way
  11. Statementבית הלל limit the rule to the original incident
  12. Challengeבית שמאי say the details were just what happened
  13. Conclusionבית הלל change their ruling
  14. ChallengeThe baraita sharpens בית שמאי's challenge
  15. ConclusionThe incident's details apply to all cases
  16. ResolutionWhy בית הלל insist on the same country
  17. Rejectionבית שמאי say caravans travel between countries too
  18. QuestionWhat was the original incident?
  19. ResponseThe snake bite during the wheat harvest
  20. QuestionIs another מחלוקת the same as this one?
  21. ProofThe ברייתא: how not to carry מי חטאת across a river
  22. Proofרבי חנניא בן עקיבא limits the rule to the original event
  23. QuestionMatching each opinion to a house
  24. RejectionThe רבנן can agree with בית הלל
  25. Rejectionרבי חנניא בן עקיבא can agree with בית שמאי
  26. QuestionWhat was the incident?
  27. ResponseThe corpse in the boat
  28. StatementShe may remarry, but may she collect her marriage contract?
  29. ChallengeIf you allow the serious prohibition, surely allow the money
  30. Resolutionבית הלל begin their reply