Yevamos 62a
יבמות ס״ב ע״א
Yevamot 62a
Learn Yevamos 62a step by step: Aramaic beside English, every question, answer and proof colour-coded.
Open Yevamos 62a in Gemara Clarity
Topic
How the מצוה of פריה ורביה is fulfilled: משה's example, רבי נתן's reports of בית שמאי and בית הלל, a convert's earlier children, and children who died.
Overview
The amud opens by finishing a back-and-forth about the מצוה of פריה ורביה. Why don't בית הלל learn from משה, who separated from his wife after two sons? The answer is that משה acted on his own reasoning. A ברייתא lists three things משה decided on his own, and ה׳ agreed with each one: separating from his wife, breaking the לוחות, and adding a day before מתן תורה. The גמרא then brings two ברייתות in which רבי נתן reports the argument between בית שמאי and בית הלל differently, along with the פסוקים behind each version. Next, רבי יוחנן and ריש לקיש argue whether a convert's children from before he converted count. They are consistent with how they rule about a בכור for inheritance. This leads to a discussion of whether gentiles and slaves have family lineage. Finally, רב הונא and רבי יוחנן argue whether a man whose children died has fulfilled the מצוה. The amud ends as the גמרא begins a challenge to רב הונא from a ברייתא, which continues on the next amud.
Opening lines
מִשֶּׁאִי אֶפְשָׁר.
from what is not possible.
וּבֵית הִלֵּל נָמֵי,
And בית הלל too,
לֵילְפוּ מִמֹּשֶׁה!
let them learn from משה!
אָמְרִי לָךְ:
They will tell you:
The steps (38)
- ResolutionEnd of the rejection: we can't learn from what was impossible
- ChallengeWhy don't בית הלל learn from משה?
- Resolutionמשה acted on his own reasoning
- ProofThe ברייתא: three things משה did on his own
- QuestionWhat reasoning led משה to separate from his wife?
- Responseמשה's קל וחומר from the people at Sinai
- Proofה׳ agreed: 'You, stand here with Me'
- QuestionWhat reasoning led משה to break the לוחות?
- Responseמשה's קל וחומר from the קרבן פסח
- Proofה׳ agreed: 'Well done for breaking them'
- QuestionWhy did משה add a day?
- ResponseToday is like tomorrow, so the night counts
- Proofה׳ agreed: the שכינה came on שבת
- Statementרבי נתן's first report: four children or two
- Questionרב הונא asks for בית שמאי's source
- Responseאדם and חוה had four children
- QuestionHow do the רבנן read the פסוק?
- Responseחוה was just thanking ה׳
- Statementרבי נתן's second report: two children or one
- Questionרבא asks for בית הלל's source
- ResponseThe world was made to be lived in
- StatementDid a convert with children from before fulfill the מצוה?
- StatementThe reasons behind each opinion
- StatementThe same dispute about a firstborn's inheritance
- ResponseWhy the inheritance dispute had to be stated too
- ConclusionWhy the first dispute was needed, and both are necessary
- Challengeרבי יוחנן challenges ריש לקיש from a verse about a gentile king
- Resolutionריש לקיש answers that conversion cuts off lineage
- Statementרב: everyone agrees a slave has no lineage
- ChallengeChallenge from ציבא, a slave who had sons
- Resolution'Son' can just mean offspring, like 'a bull, son of cattle'
- ChallengeThen the gentile king's verse should be read the same way
- ResolutionThe king's verse names both him and his father
- ResolutionAnother answer: elsewhere gentiles are traced back two generations
- StatementNew dispute: a man whose children died
- Statementרב הונא's reason: bringing souls into the world
- Statementרבי יוחנן's reason: the world must be inhabited
- ChallengeSetting up a challenge from a ברייתא