Yevamos 79b
יבמות ע״ט ע״ב
Yevamot 79b
Learn Yevamos 79b step by step: Aramaic beside English, every question, answer and proof colour-coded.
Open Yevamos 79b in Gemara Clarity
Topic
The נתינים, and when a סריס or איילונית is part of יבום and חליצה
Overview
The amud opens by finishing the topic of the נתינים. רבי refused to permit them, because even if we give up our share in them, no one can give up the מזבח's share. רבי יוחנן holds the reverse. Then a new משנה begins: רבי יהושע heard two traditions, that a סריס does חליצה and that he does not. רבי עקיבא explains that a סריס אדם, who was once fertile, does חליצה, while a סריס חמה does not. רבי אליעזר says the opposite. The משנה adds that a סריס and an איילונית have no יבום or חליצה, and that relations with them count as בעילת זנות. The גמרא asks how רבי עקיבא can allow a סריס אדם to do חליצה, since he treats a לאו like כרת. After the answers of רבי אמי and רבה are rejected, רב יוסף explains that for רבי עקיבא's school only לאוין of close relatives cancel a marriage. רבא then proves that fitness from an earlier time counts for ייבום, and the amud ends by beginning to define a סריס חמה.
Opening lines
בִּימֵי רַבִּי
In the days of Rabbi
בִּקְּשׁוּ לְהַתִּיר נְתִינִים.
they sought to permit the Gibeonites.
אָמַר לָהֶם רַבִּי:
Rabbi said to them:
חֶלְקֵנוּ נַתִּיר,
Our share we can permit,
The steps (25)
- Statementרבי refuses to permit the Gibeonites
- Statementרבי יוחנן holds the reverse view
- Statementרבי יהושע's two conflicting traditions about a eunuch
- Resolutionרבי עקיבא: man-made eunuch versus eunuch from birth
- Statementרבי אליעזר reverses רבי עקיבא's distinction
- ProofTestimony about בן מגוסת supports רבי עקיבא
- StatementA סריס and an איילונית do neither חליצה nor יבום
- StatementTheir חליצה does not disqualify her, but their relations do
- ChallengeHow can a סריס אדם do חליצה if רבי עקיבא treats a לאו like כרת?
- ResolutionThe case is where the brother married a convert
- ChallengeThen he should be able to do full ייבום too
- ResolutionYes, he can do ייבום. רבי עקיבא just matched רבי יהושע's wording
- ProofThe משנה's wording proves ייבום was allowed
- Challengeרבה's objection from a teaching about injured men
- ResolutionThe man was injured only after the יבמה fell to him
- Challengeאביי: the later prohibition should push away the ייבום
- Proofאביי begins a proof from רבן גמליאל's ruling
- ProofEnd of the משנה: a wife's sister pushes aside ייבום
- ChallengeSo the injury prohibition should also push aside ייבום
- Resolutionרב יוסף: This תנא follows the school of רבי עקיבא
- ChallengeHe can't 'establish a name for his brother'
- Resolutionרבא: Then no woman could ever have ייבום
- Challengeרבא's argument seems to refute רבי אליעזר
- ResolutionA dying man only has weakness that has set in
- QuestionWhat counts as a natural-born eunuch