Gemara Clarity

Zevachim 16a

זבחים ט״ז ע״א

Learn Zevachim 16a step by step: Aramaic beside English, every question, answer and proof colour-coded.

Open Zevachim 16a in Gemara Clarity

Topic

How we know that a זר, and an אונן, ruin the עבודה: logical proofs and sources from פסוקים

Overview

The גמרא wants to prove that a זר who does the sacrificial service ruins it (חילל). It first tries a קל וחומר from a בעל מום. When that is knocked down, it builds a הצד השוה from a בעל מום and a טמא, and then from a בעל מום and an אונן. Each time it answers attacks along the way, including one about serving on a במה, which רב סמא pushes back on. רב משרשיא offers a different proof, a קל וחומר from a כהן who served sitting. The גמרא defends it, and also shows from 'לפני ה׳' that a sitting כהן is fit on a במה. Then the גמרא turns to the אונן and brings two פסוקים as sources: one from the כהן גדול who does not leave the מקדש, and רבי אלעזר's from אהרן's answer 'הן הקריבו'. It explains why each side does not use the other's פסוק. The amud ends as the school of רבי ישמעאל begins a קל וחומר from a בעל מום, which continues on the next amud.

Opening lines

זָר, שֶׁאֵינוֹ אוֹכֵל –

A non-priest, who does not eat,

אֵינוֹ דִּין שֶׁאִם עָבַד חִילֵּל?!

is it not logical that if he served, he desecrated the service?!

מָה לְבַעַל מוּם –

What about a blemished priest?

שֶׁכֵּן עָשָׂה בּוֹ קָרֵב כְּמַקְרִיב!

He is special, since with him the Torah made the offering like the one who offers it!

The steps (31)

  1. ProofFinishing the logical argument from a blemished priest
  2. RejectionThe blemished priest has a special strictness
  3. ResolutionThe impure priest shows the strictness doesn't matter
  4. RejectionThe impure priest has his own strictness
  5. ResolutionThe blemished priest shows that strictness doesn't matter
  6. ConclusionCombining both cases: what they share applies to a non-priest
  7. QuestionHow do we know a non-priest is forbidden to serve?
  8. ResponseThe source is 'a non-priest shall not come near you'
  9. RejectionBlemished and impure priests were also banned from a private altar
  10. ResolutionUse a mourner instead of an impure priest
  11. RejectionA mourner is forbidden to eat second tithe
  12. ResolutionA blemished priest proves it
  13. ConclusionThe argument goes back around: a non-priest ruins the service
  14. ChallengeChallenging the common element: neither was allowed at a במה
  15. Rejectionרב סמא: who says the אונן was forbidden at a במה?
  16. Statementרב משרשיא: a קל וחומר from a כהן who served sitting
  17. ChallengeA sitting person cannot testify
  18. ResolutionLearn from a sitting תלמיד חכם
  19. ChallengeThe category of sitting is still disqualified
  20. ResolutionA general category cannot refute
  21. ResolutionEven so, learn from יושב plus one of the others
  22. QuestionWhere do we know a sitting כהן is fit on a private altar?
  23. ResponseStanding is required only before ה׳, not on a private altar
  24. QuestionWhere do we know an אונן disqualifies the service?
  25. ResponseLearning from the כהן גדול who does not leave the מקדש
  26. Statementרבי אלעזר learns it from אהרן's answer to משה
  27. QuestionWhy didn't רבי אלעזר use the first פסוק?
  28. ResponseThe first source is only an inference
  29. QuestionWhy doesn't the other view learn from 'הֵן הִקְרִיבוּ'?
  30. ResponseThe other view holds the קרבן was burned because of טומאה
  31. StatementThe school of רבי ישמעאל starts a קל וחומר from a בעל מום