Chullin 113a
חולין קי״ג ע״א
Learn Chullin 113a step by step: Aramaic beside English, every question, answer and proof colour-coded.
Open Chullin 113a in Gemara Clarity
Topic
רבא's rule on salting with forbidden food, שמואל's laws of salting meat, and the משניות on בשר בחלב
Overview
The amud opens by asking why רבא needed his own source to forbid kosher meat salted with טריפה meat, when שמואל already taught that salted food is like boiling food. The answer is that שמואל's rule might cover only blood, while רבא teaches that juices and gravy also forbid. The גמרא then tests רבא against a ברייתא about a kosher fish salted with a non-kosher fish, and each challenge is answered by reading the ברייתא's wording carefully. Next comes a memory sign for three teachings of שמואל: meat must be salted and rinsed well, salted meat must sit on a vessel with holes, and breaking an animal's neck before it dies traps blood in the meat. Along the way the גמרא adds the order of rinsing and salting, which inner parts are not assumed to have blood, and that several pieces may be salted together. The question of whether neck-broken meat is forbidden even for the owner ends in תיקו. A new משנה teaches that putting chicken and cheese on one table breaks no Torah law, since עוף in milk is only rabbinic. Another משנה sets out which meat and milk fall under בשר בחלב, with the views of רבי עקיבא and רבי יוסי הגלילי. The גמרא then begins looking for the source, with רבי אלעזר's proof from 'the kid of the goats' continuing on the next amud.
Opening lines
וְלֵימָא לֵיהּ מִדִּשְׁמוּאֵל,
But let him say it from Shmuel's statement,
דְּאָמַר שְׁמוּאֵל:
as Shmuel said:
מָלִיחַ הֲרֵי הוּא כְּרוֹתֵחַ,
Salted food is like boiling food,
וְכָבוּשׁ הֲרֵי הוּא כִּמְבוּשָּׁל!
and pickled food is like cooked food!
The steps (33)
- ChallengeWhy not just quote שמואל?
- Resolutionשמואל's rule may cover only blood
- ChallengeChallenge from a kosher fish salted with a non-kosher fish
- ResolutionOnly the kosher fish was salted
- ChallengeThe second clause shows the first clause means both salted
- ResolutionThe second clause explains the first
- ProofLogic supports reading the first clause as kosher salted and non-kosher unsalted
- RejectionThe support is rejected: the second clause can be there to reveal the first
- ChallengeA challenge to רבא from the last clause of the ברייתא
- ResolutionThe last clause was only worded to match the clause before it
- StatementA memory sign for שמואל's teachings
- StatementMeat must be salted well and rinsed well
- StatementTwo different orders: salt-rinse or rinse-salt-rinse
- ResolutionBoth are right, depending on the butcher
- StatementHow רב דימי salted his meat
- StatementNo assumption of blood in the intestines
- StatementWhich intestines רב משרשיא meant
- StatementSalted meat goes only on a vessel with holes
- Statementרב ששת salted meat one piece at a time
- QuestionWhy not salt two pieces together?
- RejectionThe same worry would apply to one piece
- ConclusionNo difference between one piece and many
- StatementBreaking an animal's neck before it dies
- QuestionIs the meat forbidden even for oneself?
- ConclusionThe question stays unresolved
- StatementNew משנה: chicken and cheese on the table
- ChallengeDoes the משנה imply chicken with milk is a Torah prohibition?
- ResolutionReading the משנה as: placing them together will not lead to a Torah sin
- StatementNew משנה: which meat and which milk are included
- Statementרבי עקיבא: three verses exclude חיה, עוף, and a non-kosher animal
- Statementרבי יוסי הגלילי: the link to נבלה, and why עוף is still excluded
- QuestionWhat is the source?
- Responseרבי אלעזר begins: the פסוק about יהודה sending 'the kid of the goats'