Chullin 129a
חולין קכ״ט ע״א
Learn Chullin 129a step by step: Aramaic beside English, every question, answer and proof colour-coded.
Open Chullin 129a in Gemara Clarity
Topic
Hidden contact, הכשר, and food that 'acts like wood'; רבי שמעון on hanging limbs
Overview
The amud opens with a question on a ברייתא: flesh touches its limb only in a hidden spot, and טומאת בית הסתרים normally does not make things טמא. The answer that the ברייתא follows רבי מאיר is challenged, because רבי מאיר holds this only where no הכשר is needed. רבא suggests the flesh already had הכשר. When asked why such flesh would need הכשר at all, רבא answers that while it was on the limb it 'acted like wood,' not like food. The גמרא then uses this idea of acting like wood to answer five similar cases: leaven used as a seat, a food offering to עבודה זרה, food stuck to vessels, נבלה fat on the kidney, and seeds used as a roof. In each case, someone argued the strict impurity must be only rabbinic, and the answer is that the food was acting like wood. Next the גמרא turns to the משנה's line 'רבי שמעון rules it pure' and shows it refers to the first clause, about a limb hanging on a living animal. The amud ends as רבי יוחנן starts giving רבי שמעון's source: only food you can feed to others counts as 'food.' That explanation continues on the next amud.
Opening lines
טוּמְאַת בֵּית הַסְּתָרִים הִיא,
It is impurity of a hidden place,
וְטוּמְאַת בֵּית הַסְּתָרִים לָא מְטַמְּיָא.
and impurity of a hidden place does not make impure.
אֲמַר לֵיהּ: אַף לְדִידִי קַשְׁיָא לִי,
He said to him: To me too it is difficult,
וּשְׁאֵילְתֵּיהּ לְרַבִּי אַבָּא בַּר מֶמֶל,
and I asked Rabbi Abba bar Memel,
The steps (25)
- ChallengeHidden contact should not make the flesh impure
- ResolutionThe ברייתא follows רבי מאיר
- Rejectionרבי מאיר only says this when no הכשר is needed
- RejectionMaybe the flesh already had הכשר
- ChallengeWhy does the flesh need הכשר at all?
- ResolutionWhile on the limb, the flesh acted like wood
- StatementA lump of leaven set aside as a seat is no longer food
- Proofאביי: the seat's impurity must be only rabbinic
- RejectionAs a seat, the leaven acted like wood
- Statementאביי quotes the rule of a food offering to idolatry
- Proofאביי argues this impurity is only rabbinic
- RejectionThe offering acted like wood, not food
- Statementאביי quotes the rule of food stuck to vessels
- Proofאביי argues this impurity is only rabbinic
- RejectionThe connected food acted like wood, not food
- Statementרב פפא quotes the rule of נבלה fat in villages
- Proofרב פפא argues the fat's impurity from the kidney is rabbinic
- RejectionThe fat acted like wood while serving the kidney
- Statementרב מתנה's case: a house roofed with seeds
- Proofרב מתנה argues the roof's impurity is only rabbinic
- RejectionThe seeds acted like wood, not food
- StatementQuoting the משנה: רבי שמעון rules it pure
- ChallengeEither way, the limb should be impure
- Resolutionרבי שמעון is arguing on the first line of the משנה
- StatementThe verse behind רבי שמעון's ruling