Kesubos 72a
כתובות ע״ב ע״א
Ketubot 72a
Learn Kesubos 72a step by step: Aramaic beside English, every question, answer and proof colour-coded.
Open Kesubos 72a in Gemara Clarity
Topic
Vows a husband imposes on his wife, and wives who lose their כתובה for breaking דת משה or דת יהודית
Overview
The amud opens by finishing an explanation from before. A husband who stops his wife from visiting mourners is cutting her off, because if she never comforts others, no one will mourn her. רבי מאיר supports this from a פסוק in קהלת. The גמרא then explains other lines of the משנה. The husband's 'other reason' must be a real, well-known worry about immoral people. Saying 'shameful words' or doing a pointless chore that makes her look foolish are real harms, so she may leave with her כתובה. רב כהנא and a ברייתא add that stopping her from lending household tools ruins her name with the neighbors. A new משנה then lists wives who lose their כתובה for breaking דת משה or דת יהודית. The גמרא explains how a husband can find out about each דת משה case and why unkept vows matter. The חכמים reject the idea that he should simply keep fixing her wrongs himself. Finally, the גמרא asks why an uncovered head counts only as custom when it is a Torah law, and its answer continues on the next amud.
Opening lines
אִיכָּא נוֹעֵל בְּפָנֶיהָ,
[with a house of feasting] there is locking [a door] in front of her,
אֶלָּא לְבֵית הָאֵבֶל
but [banning her from going] to a house of mourning,
מַאי נוֹעֵל בְּפָנֶיהָ אִיכָּא?
what locking in front of her is there?
תָּנָא:
It was taught:
The steps (39)
- ChallengeHow does banning a house of mourning hurt her?
- ResponseNo one will eulogize her
- ResponseAnother version: no one will care about her
- Proofרבי מאיר: those who honor the dead will be honored
- QuestionWhat is the husband's 'other reason'?
- ResponseWorry about immoral people there
- StatementOnly if the place is known for it
- ChallengeWhy can't she just say it?
- ResolutionThey are shameful words
- ChallengeWhy can't she just fill and pour out?
- Resolutionשמואל: it is a polite way of describing preventing pregnancy
- ResolutionThe ברייתא: pouring ten jugs of water into the garbage
- ChallengeAccording to the ברייתא, what is the harm?
- Resolutionרבי יוחנן: she would look like a fool
- Statementרב כהנא: forbidding her to borrow or lend household tools
- ProofA ברייתא supports רב כהנא and adds the reverse case
- StatementThe new משנה: women who lose their כתובה for breaking דת משה
- StatementThe משנה lists the cases of דת יהודית
- Statementאבא שאול and רבי טרפון add more cases
- ChallengeHow can the untithed-food case happen?
- ResolutionShe lied that a כהן tithed the grain
- ChallengeThe same problem for the נדה case
- Proofשמואל's proof that a נדה is trusted for herself
- ResolutionShe lied that a Sage declared her blood pure
- ResolutionSecond answer: her neighbors knew she was a נדה
- ChallengeHow does he find out she did not separate חלה?
- ResolutionShe lied that a baker fixed the dough
- ProofWhy unkept vows matter: children die
- Proofרב נחמן's source: "In vain I struck your children"
- Statementרבי מאיר: the husband should make her vow
- ChallengeHow would making her vow help?
- ResolutionRather: provoke her so he can cancel her vow
- RejectionThe Sages: no one lives with a snake in a basket
- Statementרבי יהודה: The Husband Should Separate the חלה Himself
- RejectionThe Sages Reject It: No One Lives with a Snake in a Basket
- ConclusionComparing the Two Cases: חלה and Vows
- StatementBack to the משנה: Going Out with an Uncovered Head
- ChallengeBut an Uncovered Head Is a Torah Law
- ResolutionThe Answer Begins: By Torah Law