Gemara Clarity

Kiddushin 8b

קידושין ח׳ ע״ב

Learn Kiddushin 8b step by step: Aramaic beside English, every question, answer and proof colour-coded.

Open Kiddushin 8b in Gemara Clarity

Topic

Pledges in קידושין and sales, and when a woman's instructions about the money count as accepting קידושין

Overview

This amud opens with the end of רב נחמן's ruling: a man promised a מנה for קידושין but gave only a pledge, so nothing counts. רבא challenges this from a ברייתא that says קידושין with a pledge works. The גמרא answers that the ברייתא means a pledge the man holds from someone who owes him money. It backs this up with רבי יצחק's proof that a creditor really acquires a pledge. A story with רבי אמי applies the same rule to buying a maidservant. Next come a series of ברייתות about a woman who reacts to the קידושין money: she throws it away, tells him to give it to her father, his father or a stranger, or has it put on a rock or given to a dog or a poor person. The גמרא explains which actions show she accepted the money and why each ruling is needed. Two questions, a shared rock and a chasing dog, end in תיקו. The amud closes as a new story about a seller begins, and it continues on the next amud.

Opening lines

מָנֶה אֵין כָּאן –

There is no one hundred dinars here –

מַשְׁכּוֹן אֵין כָּאן.

there is no pledge here.

אֵיתִיבֵיהּ רָבָא לְרַב נַחְמָן:

Rava raised an objection to Rav Naḥman:

קִידְּשָׁה בְּמַשְׁכּוֹן מְקוּדֶּשֶׁת!

If he betrothed her with a pledge, she is betrothed!

The steps (25)

  1. StatementNeither the money nor the pledge counts
  2. Challengeרבא challenges from a ברייתא that pledge betrothal works
  3. ResolutionThe ברייתא means a pledge taken from someone else
  4. Statementרבי יצחק: a creditor acquires the pledge
  5. QuestionThe case of the maidservant bought with a silver pledge
  6. Responseרבי אמי: neither the coins nor the silver counts
  7. StatementShe threw the money into the sea: not betrothed
  8. ChallengeWould throwing it back at him really be betrothal?
  9. ResolutionThe ברייתא is speaking in a 'no need to say' style
  10. StatementA ברייתא about giving the money to her father or his father
  11. StatementWhy the ברייתא mentions both fathers
  12. StatementThe same rule with 'so-and-so'
  13. ResolutionBoth rulings are needed
  14. ResolutionWhy the 'father' case alone would not be enough
  15. ResolutionWhy the 'stranger' case alone would not be enough
  16. StatementPlacing the money on a rock
  17. QuestionWhat if the rock belongs to both of them?
  18. ConclusionThe question stays unanswered
  19. StatementGiving the loaf to a dog
  20. QuestionWhat if the dog was chasing her?
  21. QuestionThe two sides of the question about the chasing dog
  22. ConclusionThe chasing dog question stays unresolved
  23. StatementGiving the bread to a poor person does not make her betrothed
  24. ResponseWhy the poor person case fails: both are equally obligated
  25. StatementA new story begins: a man who was selling