Kiddushin 8b
קידושין ח׳ ע״ב
Learn Kiddushin 8b step by step: Aramaic beside English, every question, answer and proof colour-coded.
Open Kiddushin 8b in Gemara Clarity
Topic
Pledges in קידושין and sales, and when a woman's instructions about the money count as accepting קידושין
Overview
This amud opens with the end of רב נחמן's ruling: a man promised a מנה for קידושין but gave only a pledge, so nothing counts. רבא challenges this from a ברייתא that says קידושין with a pledge works. The גמרא answers that the ברייתא means a pledge the man holds from someone who owes him money. It backs this up with רבי יצחק's proof that a creditor really acquires a pledge. A story with רבי אמי applies the same rule to buying a maidservant. Next come a series of ברייתות about a woman who reacts to the קידושין money: she throws it away, tells him to give it to her father, his father or a stranger, or has it put on a rock or given to a dog or a poor person. The גמרא explains which actions show she accepted the money and why each ruling is needed. Two questions, a shared rock and a chasing dog, end in תיקו. The amud closes as a new story about a seller begins, and it continues on the next amud.
Opening lines
מָנֶה אֵין כָּאן –
There is no one hundred dinars here –
מַשְׁכּוֹן אֵין כָּאן.
there is no pledge here.
אֵיתִיבֵיהּ רָבָא לְרַב נַחְמָן:
Rava raised an objection to Rav Naḥman:
קִידְּשָׁה בְּמַשְׁכּוֹן מְקוּדֶּשֶׁת!
If he betrothed her with a pledge, she is betrothed!
The steps (25)
- StatementNeither the money nor the pledge counts
- Challengeרבא challenges from a ברייתא that pledge betrothal works
- ResolutionThe ברייתא means a pledge taken from someone else
- Statementרבי יצחק: a creditor acquires the pledge
- QuestionThe case of the maidservant bought with a silver pledge
- Responseרבי אמי: neither the coins nor the silver counts
- StatementShe threw the money into the sea: not betrothed
- ChallengeWould throwing it back at him really be betrothal?
- ResolutionThe ברייתא is speaking in a 'no need to say' style
- StatementA ברייתא about giving the money to her father or his father
- StatementWhy the ברייתא mentions both fathers
- StatementThe same rule with 'so-and-so'
- ResolutionBoth rulings are needed
- ResolutionWhy the 'father' case alone would not be enough
- ResolutionWhy the 'stranger' case alone would not be enough
- StatementPlacing the money on a rock
- QuestionWhat if the rock belongs to both of them?
- ConclusionThe question stays unanswered
- StatementGiving the loaf to a dog
- QuestionWhat if the dog was chasing her?
- QuestionThe two sides of the question about the chasing dog
- ConclusionThe chasing dog question stays unresolved
- StatementGiving the bread to a poor person does not make her betrothed
- ResponseWhy the poor person case fails: both are equally obligated
- StatementA new story begins: a man who was selling