Pesachim 84b
פסחים פ״ד ע״ב
Learn Pesachim 84b step by step: Aramaic beside English, every question, answer and proof colour-coded.
Open Pesachim 84b in Gemara Clarity
Topic
Finding the practical difference between 'כשר' and רבי's 'ראוי לאכילה' for שבירת העצם, and the dispute between רבי יוחנן and ריש לקיש about meat located elsewhere on the limb
Overview
The word 'בו' in the פסוק forbidding שבירת העצם of the קרבן פסח can be read in two ways. One view limits the איסור to a כשר פסח. רבי limits it to a פסח that is ראוי לאכילה. The גמרא searches for a practical case where these two views give different results. One אמורא after another proposes a case, and the next אמורא rejects it: a פסח הבא בטומאה, a פסח once valid and then disqualified, breaking a bone by day, a limb that partly went outside, raw meat, the tail, and a bone with less than a כזית. The list ends with רבינא's case: a limb with no כזית at the break but a כזית elsewhere. A ברייתא of רבי is then shown to support four of these suggestions. Finally, רבי יוחנן and ריש לקיש dispute רבינא's case. רבי יוחנן challenges ריש לקיש from a ברייתא, and ריש לקיש's answer begins at the very end of the amud and continues on the next amud.
Opening lines
הַאי פָּסוּל.
this one is disqualified.
לְמַאן דְּאָמַר רָאוּי לַאֲכִילָה —
According to the one who says 'fit for eating'
הַאי נָמֵי רָאוּי לַאֲכִילָה הוּא.
this one is also fit for eating.
רַב יוֹסֵף אָמַר:
Rav Yosef said:
The steps (30)
- ResponseFirst suggested difference: an impure פסח
- Rejectionרב יוסף rejects the impure-Pesach case
- Responseרב יוסף's case: once valid, then disqualified
- Rejectionאביי rejects רב יוסף's case
- Responseאביי's case: breaking a bone while it is still day
- ChallengeChallenge from רבי's ruling about thigh-bone marrow
- Resolutionאביי answers: your logic would also allow burning the bone at night
- ResolutionWhy burning the bone is still forbidden by the Rabbis
- ConclusionDaytime breaking is banned only by a rabbinic decree
- Rejectionרב פפא rejects the daytime case
- Responseרב פפא's case: a limb that partly went outside
- ProofA ברייתא Supports the Limb-That-Went-Out Case
- RejectionThe Limb That Went Out Is Fully Disqualified
- ResolutionNew Difference: Breaking a Bone of Raw Meat
- RejectionRaw Meat Can Still Be Roasted and Eaten
- ResolutionNew Difference: Breaking a Bone in the Tail
- RejectionThe Tail Is Certainly Not Eaten At All
- Resolutionרב אשי's Difference: A Bone Without an Olive's Worth of Meat
- Rejectionרבינא rejects the limb with less than an olive-size of meat
- Resolutionרבינא's difference: an olive-size of meat elsewhere on the limb
- ProofA ברייתא of רבי: the rule applies to a valid קרבן only
- ProofOnce valid but disqualified at eating time: no prohibition
- ProofThe prohibition requires a minimum eating amount
- ProofWhat is fit for the altar has no prohibition of breaking a bone
- ProofThe prohibition applies only at the time of eating
- StatementA dispute about a limb with meat only in a different spot
- Challengeרבי יוחנן brings a ברייתא against ריש לקיש
- QuestionWhat does 'without an olive-bulk' mean?
- ChallengeThe ברייתא means meat in another place, a difficulty for ריש לקיש
- ResolutionOpening the Response to the Challenge