Shabbos 134b
שבת קל״ד ע״ב
Shabbat 134b
Learn Shabbos 134b step by step: Aramaic beside English, every question, answer and proof colour-coded.
Open Shabbos 134b in Gemara Clarity
Topic
Washing a baby after מילה on שבת, treating wounds on שבת, and doubtful cases of מילה
Overview
The משנה allows washing a baby on שבת before and after his מילה, with sprinkling by hand but not with a vessel. רבי אלעזר בן עזריה allows washing even on the third day, which the פסוק about שכם shows is a time of danger. The גמרא asks how washing can be allowed if a vessel is forbidden. רב יהודה and רבה בר אבוה read the משנה as 'washing means sprinkling by hand.' רבא reads it instead as two days: normal washing on the first day and only sprinkling on the third day. A ברייתא supports רבא, but he later regrets ruling against the elders, because the משנה's wording fits their reading. The הלכה follows רבי אלעזר בן עזריה: the baby may be washed in every case, because he is in danger. The גמרא then discusses hot water, oil, and bandages on a wound on שבת. Finally, it begins the source for why a doubtful מילה does not override שבת, a discussion that continues on the next amud.
Opening lines
מַתְנִי׳ מַרְחִיצִין אֶת הַקָּטָן
MISHNA: One may wash the baby
בֵּין לִפְנֵי הַמִּילָה
both before the circumcision
וּבֵין לְאַחַר הַמִּילָה,
and after the circumcision,
וּמְזַלְּפִין עָלָיו בַּיָּד,
and one may sprinkle (water) on him by hand,
The steps (34)
- StatementWashing the baby before and after the circumcision
- Statementרבי אלעזר בן עזריה: washing on the third day
- StatementDoubtful cases and a hermaphrodite baby
- ChallengeWashing is allowed, so why is sprinkling with a vessel forbidden?
- ResolutionThe משנה uses a 'how' structure
- Challengeרבא objects that the משנה says 'washing', not sprinkling
- Resolutionרבא rereads the משנה as two different days
- ProofA ברייתא supports רבא's reading
- StatementThe ברייתא's sprinkling rule follows the תנא קמא
- QuestionWhy is the verse only a hint and not a proof?
- ResponseAdults heal slowly, but babies heal quickly
- Statementרבא rules in practice, falls ill, and regrets it
- ChallengeThe רבנן point out that a ברייתא supports רבא
- Resolutionרבא answers that the משנה's wording fits the elders
- ProofProof from the word 'wash' in רבי אלעזר בן עזריה's statement
- ConclusionThe הלכה follows רבי אלעזר בן עזריה
- QuestionWhole body or only the place of the circumcision?
- Responseרבי יעקב: it must mean the whole body
- Challengeרב יוסף: water heated on שבת is different
- Challengeרב דימי: maybe the dispute is about water heated before שבת
- ResolutionThe baby is in danger, so it must be heating on שבת
- ConclusionThe ruling: washing is allowed in every case because of danger
- Statementרב and שמואל disagree about hot water and oil on a wound
- ChallengeA ברייתא forbids putting oil and hot water on a cloth for a wound
- ResolutionThe cloth is forbidden only because of squeezing
- ChallengeA second ברייתא: not even onto a cloth already on the wound
- ResolutionHere too, the reason is squeezing
- ProofA ברייתא supports שמואל's way of applying oil and hot water
- StatementWhich dry materials may be put on a wound
- ChallengeRags allowed and rags forbidden in the same ברייתא
- ResolutionNew rags versus old rags
- Conclusionאביי learns that rags heal
- StatementBack to the משנה: a doubtful baby and a hermaphrodite
- StatementOnly a certain foreskin pushes aside שבת