Yevamos 91a
יבמות צ״א ע״א
Yevamot 91a
Learn Yevamos 91a step by step: Aramaic beside English, every question, answer and proof colour-coded.
Open Yevamos 91a in Gemara Clarity
Topic
Penalties for a woman who remarried on a false report of her husband's death, the opinions of the lenient תנאים, and רב's ruling about a woman who remarried without the court's permission
Overview
The גמרא keeps explaining the משנה about a woman who was told her husband died, remarried, and then saw her first husband return. It shows that the ban on marrying a כהן was listed only next to the new point that a בת לוי loses מעשר, and רב ששת explains that this loss is a special קנס. The בת כהן loses even תרומה דרבנן. Her sons lose כתובת בנין דיכרין, because the קנס reaches her children too. Both husbands' brothers do חליצה and not יבום, but for different reasons, one by Torah law and one by Rabbinic law. רב הונא and רבי יוחנן then disagree about which of the lenient תנאים at the end of the משנה (רבי יוסי, רבי אלעזר, רבי שמעון) agree with which, each using a קל וחומר. רב rules like the משנה's line that a woman who remarried on witnesses alone may return to her husband. רב נחמן asks why he did not openly name רבי שמעון, and this question stays unanswered. רב ששת argues the ruling was not needed and brings a ברייתא as proof, and the גמרא shows two ways the ברייתא could follow רבי שמעון, so a real dispute may remain.
Opening lines
פְּשִׁיטָא!
It is obvious!
בַּת לֵוִי מִן הַמַּעֲשֵׂר
A Levite's daughter from the tithe
אִיצְטְרִיכָא לֵיהּ.
he needed to teach.
וּבַת לֵוִי מִן הַמַּעֲשֵׂר
And a Levite's daughter, from the tithe
The steps (31)
- ChallengeIsn't it obvious she is barred from marrying a priest?
- ResolutionIt was said only because of the Levite's daughter
- ChallengeA ברייתא says זנות does not bar a Levite woman from מעשר
- Resolutionרב ששת: it is a special penalty
- StatementA priest's daughter is barred even from תרומה דרבנן
- ChallengeWhat כתובה could the heirs inherit?
- Resolutionרב פפא: it means the sons' כתובה
- ChallengeIsn't this obvious?
- ResolutionWe might have thought the penalty is only on her
- StatementWhy both brothers do חליצה but not יבום
- StatementThe later תנאים agree with the earlier ones
- StatementWhy רבי שמעון agrees with רבי אלעזר
- StatementWhy רבי אלעזר does not agree with רבי שמעון
- StatementBoth later תנאים agree with רבי יוסי about the כתובה
- Statementרבי יוסי does not agree with the later leniencies
- Statementרבי יוחנן reverses the rule
- Statementרבי יוסי agrees with רבי אלעזר
- Statementרבי אלעזר does not agree about the כתובה
- StatementBoth earlier תנאים agree with רבי שמעון
- Statementרבי שמעון does not agree with the money leniencies
- Statementרב rules like the line about marrying without permission
- ChallengeWhy not say plainly that the הלכה follows רבי שמעון
- ChallengeEven so, he could have said 'like רבי שמעון in the last case'
- ConclusionThe question is left standing
- Statementרב ששת: רב said this while half asleep
- ProofNo one disagrees, because she was like a woman forced
- ProofA ברייתא: marrying on witnesses' word does not even need a גט
- ChallengeCan the ברייתא follow רבי שמעון?
- ResponseSuggestion: the ברייתא follows the רבנן
- ResolutionIt is רבי שמעון, read his words differently
- Resolutionרב אשי: רבי שמעון was talking about the first husband