Zevachim 106b
זבחים ק״ו ע״ב
Learn Zevachim 106b step by step: Aramaic beside English, every question, answer and proof colour-coded.
Open Zevachim 106b in Gemara Clarity
Topic
The source for the לאו against slaughtering an offering outside the עזרה: the ברייתא on ויקרא 17, רבי אבין's rejected קל וחומר, and רבי יוחנן's גזירה שוה.
Overview
This amud finishes a ברייתא on ויקרא 17. Offerings consecrated and sacrificed after private altars (במות) were forbidden have both a punishment (כרת) and a warning (אזהרה). Offerings consecrated while במות were allowed but sacrificed outside after the ban get an עשה and a לא תעשה, but no כרת. Because the verse ולא יזבחו עוד is used for that special case, the גמרא needs another source for the general לאו against slaughtering outside. רבי אבין suggests a קל וחומר: if the lighter case is forbidden, surely the case with כרת is forbidden too. רבינא challenges this method from חלב, and רבא answers that every possible source for חלב has its own stringency, so the תורה had to write its לאו. רבא then raises a second challenge from פסח and מילה, which רב כהנא answers by pointing out that a missed פסח can be made up. Finally the גמרא rejects the method itself, since a warning can never be learned from a קל וחומר. It learns the warning instead from רבי יוחנן's גזירה שוה of 'bringing'–'bringing'.
Opening lines
שֶׁהֲרֵי עוֹנְשָׁן אָמוּר:
For their punishment is stated:
״וְאֶל פֶּתַח אֹהֶל מוֹעֵד״,
"And to the entrance of the Tent of Meeting"
אַזְהָרָה – דִּכְתִיב:
and the warning: as it is written,
״הִשָּׁמֶר לְךָ פֶּן תַּעֲלֶה עֹלֹתֶיךָ״.
"Take heed to yourself lest you offer up your burnt offerings."
The steps (26)
- ProofProof that the earlier verses cover offerings consecrated and sacrificed during the prohibition
- StatementThe later verses deal with offerings consecrated when private altars were allowed
- ProofProof from the verse, and the meaning of "upon the open field"
- Statement"And they shall bring them to ה׳" is a positive commandment
- QuestionWhere is the prohibition for this case?
- ResponseThe prohibition comes from "and they shall not slaughter anymore"
- StatementThe ברייתא Rules Out the כרת Punishment
- Responseרבי אבין Derives the Prohibition Through a קל וחומר
- Challengeרבינא Challenges the Method Using Forbidden Fat
- Resolutionרבא Shows Why the Carcass Comparison Fails
- ChallengeTry learning חלב from impure creeping animals
- ResolutionImpure creeping animals make things impure even in a tiny amount
- ChallengeTry learning חלב from pure creeping animals
- ResolutionPure creeping animals are forbidden even in a tiny amount
- ChallengeTry learning חלב from ערלה and כלאי הכרם
- Resolutionערלה and כלאי הכרם are forbidden even for benefit
- ChallengeTry learning חלב from שביעית produce
- Resolutionשביעית passes its holiness onto the money paid for it
- ChallengeSuggesting תרומה as the source
- Resolutionתרומה has no permitted part
- ConclusionThe same objection knocks out every source
- Statementרבא brings up the משנה about פסח and מילה
- ChallengeA קל וחומר from מותיר should give פסח a לאו
- Resolutionרב כהנא: the קל וחומר from מותיר fails
- ChallengeA warning cannot be learned from a קל וחומר
- Resolutionרבי יוחנן's גזירה שוה from the word 'bringing'