Zevachim 82b

זבחים פ״ב ע״ב

Learn Zevachim 82b step by step: Aramaic beside English, every question, answer and proof colour-coded.

Open Zevachim 82b in Gemara Clarity

Topic

When bringing blood or meat inside or outside, or intending to, makes a קרבן פסול, and why the פסוק needs both ״קדש״ and ״פנימה״

Overview

The amud opens by finishing a ברייתא: intent to bring blood into the היכל does not disqualify a קרבן, because the forbidden 'place' must be outside the proper area for blood, meat and אימורים together. A קל וחומר suggests that intent to take blood outside the עזרה should not disqualify either, but the word 'פגול' in the פסוק teaches that it does. A second ברייתא teaches that meat taken outside its area is פסול, while meat brought into the היכל stays כשר. It defends each half with a פסוק: 'מדמה' and 'בשדה'. Next, a ברייתא learns from ״אל הקדש פנימה״ that blood of a חטאת brought into the היכל is פסול, and the גמרא asks why ״פנימה״ is needed. רבא compares it to ״תושב״ and ״שכיר״. אביי challenges the comparison and suggests a roundabout path. רבא rejects that and explains that blood headed for the inner room is not פסול while passing through the היכל. The amud ends with a chain of questions from רבא about blood of inner offerings and of יום הכיפורים that is brought into the קודש הקדשים, and this chain continues on the next amud.

Opening lines

The steps (23)

1. StatementThe place must count for blood, meat, and altar portions
2. ChallengeA קל וחומר suggests intent to take the blood outside should not disqualify
3. ResolutionThe פסוק itself teaches intent outside the proper place
4. StatementMeat taken outside is invalid; meat brought inside stays valid
5. ChallengeA logical argument that meat brought into the היכל should be disqualified
6. ResolutionThe word 'מדמה' limits the rule to blood
7. ChallengeA reverse argument that meat taken outside should be fit
8. ResolutionMeat that leaves its boundary becomes forbidden
9. StatementBlood brought into the Sanctuary is also disqualified
10. ChallengeWhy does the verse need the word 'within'?
11. Resolutionרבא: Each word explains the other
12. StatementThe parallel case: tenant and hired worker
13. ChallengeWhy mention the hired worker at all?
14. ResolutionWithout ״שכיר״ we would misread ״תושב״
15. Challengeאביי: the slave case is not like the blood case
16. Resolutionאביי: ״פנימה״ is for blood that took a roundabout path
17. Rejectionרבא: the פסוק speaks of normal bringing
18. Resolutionרבא: passing through on the way inside does not make it פסול
19. Questionרבא asks about היכל offerings brought into the inner room
20. QuestionTwo sides of רבא's question about inner-room blood
21. Questionיום הכיפורים blood brought back into the inner room
22. QuestionIs it still its place, or did leaving end that?
23. QuestionSetting up the next question: sprinkling on the curtain